tdarr_updater_relaunch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. 'Relaunch' implies a destructive action (restarting the server), but it does not disclose potential disruptions, authentication needs, or effects on ongoing processes. More transparency is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of 10 words that immediately conveys the core action and condition. No unnecessary words or structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description is minimal but not fully complete. It does not explain what happens after relaunch (e.g., success/failure indication) or how it differs from similar tools like 'tdarr_restart_server'. Additional context would improve usability.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, and the schema description coverage is trivially 100%. According to guidelines, zero parameters baseline is 4. The description adds no param info, but none is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Relaunch'), the resource ('Tdarr Server'), and the condition ('when an update is ready'). This specificity distinguishes it from siblings like 'tdarr_restart_server' which restarts without an update context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage after an update is ready but does not provide explicit guidance on when not to use this tool or compare it to alternatives like 'tdarr_updater_check' or 'tdarr_restart_server'. The context is implied rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.