tdarr_admin_register
Register a new user to the Tdarr system by providing a username and assigning roles.
Instructions
Admin register a new user
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| roles | Yes | User roles | |
| username | Yes | Username to register |
Register a new user to the Tdarr system by providing a username and assigning roles.
Admin register a new user
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| roles | Yes | User roles | |
| username | Yes | Username to register |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action without explaining effects (e.g., whether it creates a user, duplicate handling, permissions required). This is minimal disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence with no fluff, achieving conciseness. However, it lacks structural elements like bullet points or separate sections.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description is too minimal. It does not explain valid roles, response format, or constraints, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, with both parameters having descriptions. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Admin register a new user' clearly states the verb 'register' and resource 'user', and specifies the scope 'Admin', distinguishing it from sibling tools like tdarr_public_auth_register.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for admin user registration, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like tdarr_public_auth_register or conditions for use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/maximeallanic/tdarr-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server