Skip to main content
Glama

stop_watch

Stops a running situation watch opened in this chat so no further change notifications arrive for it. Use when the person no longer needs updates on that road, charger, or topic.

Instructions

Ends a watch this conversation opened with watch_situation, so no further change notifications arrive for it. Use when the person no longer needs to be told — "du musst mir nichts mehr zur A8 sagen", "stop watching that charger". When they name the subject and not an id, take the id from viafrei://watches. Do NOT use to look a situation up (call check_road_status), to list what is running (read viafrei://watches), or to cancel anything outside this chat — there is nothing subscribed elsewhere. A watch id from another session is not found, never stopped. Results carry their attribution line.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
uriNoThe watch's resource uri, e.g. "viafrei://watch/12". Give either this or `watch_id`, not both.
languageNoSet this on every call to the language the person is writing in: "en" if they wrote English, "de" if they wrote German. Do not leave it out because it has a default — the default is only the fallback when the language is genuinely unclear, and an English question answered in German is a wrong answer. Place names, station names and road numbers are never translated in either language; in English the German term is kept in parentheses so the person recognises it on signs and in local apps.de
watch_idNoThe numeric id of the watch to stop, as `watch_situation` returned it (the 12 in viafrei://watch/12).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.7.3
    • addedInput schema / properties / uri / maxLength
      Added value: +64
  2. First observedv0.0.9

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, openWorldHint=false and idempotentHint=false. The description adds context annotations cannot express: session-scoped ownership, cross-session watches being 'not found, never stopped', and that results carry an attribution line. It does not state behavior on re-stopping an already-stopped watch, but overall disclosure is strong.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the core effect, then usage triggers, then the id-resolution procedure, then exclusions — a sensible order. It is dense and includes bilingual example phrasing, but every sentence carries routing or behavioral information rather than filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a session-scoped mutation tool with no output schema, the definition covers effect, triggers, id resolution, ownership semantics, and error behavior for foreign watches. Nothing an agent needs in order to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description genuinely adds value by telling the agent how to derive the id when the person names a subject instead of an id ('take the id from viafrei://watches'). It leaves the uri vs watch_id choice to the schema, which already documents it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Ends a watch this conversation opened with watch_situation') and its immediate consequence (no further change notifications). It explicitly distinguishes itself from check_road_status, watch_situation, and viafrei://watches, so an agent can route correctly without opening another schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete triggers ('du musst mir nichts mehr zur A8 sagen', 'stop watching that charger'), names the alternatives for adjacent intents (check_road_status for lookups, viafrei://watches for listing), and states a hard exclusion ('cancel anything outside this chat — there is nothing subscribed elsewhere').

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.