getNodeInfo
Retrieve detailed information about a node by its ID to analyze Sketch design elements.
Instructions
Get detailed information about a node by its ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodeId | Yes | The ID of the node |
Retrieve detailed information about a node by its ID to analyze Sketch design elements.
Get detailed information about a node by its ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodeId | Yes | The ID of the node |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description bears full burden but only says 'Get detailed information', failing to disclose what constitutes 'detailed', whether it's read-only, or any side effects. Minimal behavioral info.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence of 10 words, extremely concise and front-loaded with the core action and object.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the sparse context (1 param, no output schema, no annotations), the description fails to explain what 'detailed information' includes, error behavior, or return format. Incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter, but the tool description adds no meaning beyond 'by its ID', which parallels the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'detailed information about a node', and the method 'by its ID'. It distinguishes from siblings like getNodePosition (position only) and getNodesSummary (summary).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as getNodePosition or getMultipleNodeInfo. The description lacks contextual advice for an agent.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mater1996/sketch-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server