Skip to main content
Glama
mater1996

sketch-mcp-server

by mater1996

getDocumentStructure

Obtain the complete page and node hierarchy from a Sketch file, with options to limit depth, include specific fields, or group similar nodes for concise representation.

Instructions

Get complete document structure with all pages and their hierarchies

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
includeDetailsNoWhether to include detailed node information
maxNodesPerPageNoMaximum number of nodes to return per page
fieldsNoSpecific fields to include in response (e.g., ["id", "name", "type"])
excludeFieldsNoFields to exclude from response (e.g., ["style", "position"])
summaryModeNoReturn summary with statistics instead of full structure
maxDepthNoMaximum depth of hierarchy to return
groupSimilarNoGroup similar nodes to reduce data size
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It only states the basic purpose and does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether it is read-only, potential performance implications, or response size limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single efficient sentence that front-loads the main purpose. It could include more useful information without becoming verbose, but as is, it is concise and earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 7 parameters and no output schema, the description is far too brief. It does not explain how parameters affect output or what the response structure is, making it incomplete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the input schema already describes all 7 parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, earning the baseline score of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves the complete document structure including pages and hierarchies, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like getPageStructure or listPages by emphasizing the full structure.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention any context, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mater1996/sketch-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server