A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceMCP server for Polish case-law (SAOS) — Supreme Court, Constitutional Tribunal, common courts and KIO — with ECLI and verifiable citations.
3
40 npm
2
MIT
mcp-nsa
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-nsa
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Polish public-procurement rulings (KIO / Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza) with verifiable citations.51Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server providing access to Polish law statutes, provisions, case law, and EU law integrations, enabling natural language legal research, citation validation, and cross-referencing.45 npm7Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for querying live Polish court case law (orzecznictwo) via the SAOS API, offering tools to search judgments, fetch full cases, find judgments citing specific statutory provisions, and check Constitutional Tribunal citations.7Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Polish legislation (ISAP / Sejm) — search acts (Dz.U., M.P.) and fetch full texts with ELI identifiers and verifiable citations.355 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceUnified MCP server for Polish legal data, enabling search and retrieval across case law, legislation, company register, tax rulings, public procurement, and EU sources through four aggregated tools.41Apache 2.0
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Tools are mostly distinct: search for general queries, search_by_case for case number lookup, and get_judgment for full retrieval by ID. The only minor overlap is that search_by_case is described as a shortcut for search with a case number, which could cause slight confusion but is clearly documented.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names use a consistent snake_case pattern with verbs (get, search) followed by nouns or qualifiers. The naming is uniform and predictable across the set.
Tool Count4/5
With 3 tools covering search, retrieval, and case-specific lookup, the set is minimal but reasonable for a focused legal database. The scope is narrow (administrative courts), so no heavy tool count is needed.
Completeness3/5
The tools cover basic search and retrieval, but notable gaps exist: lack of filtering by date, court level, or other metadata in search, and get_judgment only returns the first 2000 characters, limiting full-text access. Agents may need workarounds for deeper queries.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessUnresponsive