openwisp-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to openwisp-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing VyOS routers via the VyOS HTTP API, allowing AI assistants to read config, set interfaces, firewall rules, VPNs, and more.172MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to manage Defined Networking / Managed Nebula infrastructure, supporting tasks like network topology design, host provisioning, and security auditing through natural language.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for network operations that lets AI assistants interact with Cisco/Juniper network devices through safe, well-defined tools like compliance audits and configuration backups.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI assistants monitor and manage TP-Link Omada controllers. It provides analytics and read-only queries plus write operations such as rebooting devices, blocking clients, and changing network or firewall settings.84MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for VyOS routers via VyManager, enabling AI agents to read and manage router configurations with RBAC, audit, and commit-confirm safety.9GPL 3.0

wlanpi-mcpofficial
AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes WLAN Pi capabilities like device info, Wi-Fi scanning, service management, and VLANs to AI assistants via the wlanpi-core REST API.711BSD 3-Clause
TDQS
Scored across 92 tools
Most tools target distinct resource+action combinations, but overlapping pairs such as openwisp_create_device_location and openwisp_update_device_location both use HTTP PUT on the same path, and several CRUD variants update/patch the same resource. Descriptions help, but with 92 tools an agent can still misselect near-duplicates.
All tools use a consistent openwisp_ prefix and a snake_case verb_noun pattern, e.g. list_devices, get_device, create_device, delete_device. Non-CRUD verbs like renew, revoke, execute, and obtain are still predictable and fit the convention.
92 tools is far beyond the recommended 3-15 range and exceeds the 50+ extreme-mismatch threshold for a single MCP server. Even with a large OpenWISP API surface, this creates enormous context and selection burden.
Coverage is broad across devices, templates, certificates, VPNs, locations, users, topologies, and RADIUS, but notable lifecycle gaps remain: no update_user or organization CRUD, no delete_device_group, and several list-only resources. Core workflows are present, but the surface is not fully complete.