Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to openwisp-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to manage Defined Networking / Managed Nebula infrastructure, supporting tasks like network topology design, host provisioning, and security auditing through natural language.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for network operations that lets AI assistants interact with Cisco/Juniper network devices through safe, well-defined tools like compliance audits and configuration backups.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI assistants monitor and manage TP-Link Omada controllers. It provides analytics and read-only queries plus write operations such as rebooting devices, blocking clients, and changing network or firewall settings.
      84
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes WLAN Pi capabilities like device info, Wi-Fi scanning, service management, and VLANs to AI assistants via the wlanpi-core REST API.
      71
      1
      BSD 3-Clause

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 92 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct resource+action combinations, but overlapping pairs such as openwisp_create_device_location and openwisp_update_device_location both use HTTP PUT on the same path, and several CRUD variants update/patch the same resource. Descriptions help, but with 92 tools an agent can still misselect near-duplicates.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent openwisp_ prefix and a snake_case verb_noun pattern, e.g. list_devices, get_device, create_device, delete_device. Non-CRUD verbs like renew, revoke, execute, and obtain are still predictable and fit the convention.

    Tool Count1/5

    92 tools is far beyond the recommended 3-15 range and exceeds the 50+ extreme-mismatch threshold for a single MCP server. Even with a large OpenWISP API surface, this creates enormous context and selection burden.

    Completeness3/5

    Coverage is broad across devices, templates, certificates, VPNs, locations, users, topologies, and RADIUS, but notable lifecycle gaps remain: no update_user or organization CRUD, no delete_device_group, and several list-only resources. Core workflows are present, but the surface is not fully complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues