get_agent_chat_starter_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It indicates a read operation via 'Get' and specifies the returned fields, but it does not explicitly state that no changes are made, require authentication, or define behavior for missing/ambiguous agents. This is adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and each sentence earns its place. No fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with two optional params and no output schema, the description covers the essential information: what is retrieved and how to identify the target. It lacks explicit behavior on not-found scenarios and does not provide return structure details beyond the field names, but it is reasonably complete for this low-complexity tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It explains that agent_id or agent_name can be used as alternative identifiers, adding meaning beyond raw string fields. However, it doesn't clarify whether at least one is required, how conflicts are handled if both are provided, or the expected format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function with a specific verb 'Get' and resource 'chat starter settings for an agent', and elaborates that this includes 'welcome message and quick prompts'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_agent and update_agent_chat_starter_settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It instructs to 'Use agent_id or agent_name', providing parameter usage guidance, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_agent or update_agent_chat_starter_settings. The context implies using it when you need starter settings, so usage is only implied, not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.