gpt-researcher-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to gpt-researcher-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMulti-purpose research MCP server integrating web search, deep research, web scraping, research methodology routing, and GPT Researcher report generation.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for AI-powered research using Gemini. Provides fast grounded web search, deep autonomous research, URL extraction, and session management.69MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA deep-research MCP server exposing a single task-augmented tool that runs GPT-Researcher with Tavily search, Anthropic Claude, and OpenAI embeddings, streaming progress via MCP tasks and Upjack entity stream.7MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that searches the web, reads pages, and returns concise summaries with cited sources via the research_web and read_url tools.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA self-contained web-research MCP server that lets local LLM agents search, fetch, and synthesize web content using tools like web_search, web_fetch, and web_research.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes Gemini's Deep Research Agent for comprehensive web research.213 npm4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools, add-note and get_report, have completely distinct purposes with no overlap. An agent can easily tell them apart based on their names and descriptions.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using hyphens (add-note, get-report). This is a clear and predictable naming convention.
With only two tools, the server feels thin and borderline under-scoped for a research-focused MCP server. Two tools fall into the lower end of acceptable range but do not feel entirely insufficient.
The server lacks core operations for a research workflow, such as initiating research, listing past reports, or managing notes beyond adding. Significant gaps exist that would likely cause agent failures in practical use.