get_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool returns permissions and page rules, which is valuable behavioral context beyond the schema. However, it does not explicitly state that the operation is read-only or mention any side effects, though this is implied for a 'get' operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently conveys the purpose without extraneous words. It is front-loaded with the main action and provides essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple tool with one parameter, the description adequately covers the return value (permissions and page rules). However, it could be more explicit about the parameter's role, though the parameter name 'id' makes it clear. No output schema exists, so the description compensates reasonably.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the 'id' parameter beyond the context of identifying a group. The parameter is required, but the description adds no additional meaning or guidance on its format or expected values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'get' and the resource 'group', and specifies that it returns 'permissions and page rules', which distinguishes it from siblings like 'list_groups' (which returns a list) and 'get_page' (which gets a page).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for fetching a single group's details, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over 'list_groups' or other sibling tools, nor does it mention any prerequisites or alternative scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.