delete_page
Delete a Wiki.js page by its ID, permanently removing it from the wiki.
Instructions
Delete a page by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Delete a Wiki.js page by its ID, permanently removing it from the wiki.
Delete a page by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden. It only states 'Delete a page by id' without disclosing whether deletion is permanent, any associated side effects, or required permissions. Critical behavioral context is absent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise at one sentence with no wasted words. However, it may be too sparse for a destructive tool, but brevity itself is not a flaw. It front-loads the purpose efficiently.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and a single parameter, the description should cover more about the operation's impact, return behavior, or error conditions. It falls short, leaving an agent without sufficient context for safe invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has one parameter 'id' with no description. The tool description adds 'by id', which merely restates the parameter name. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should provide more meaning (e.g., data format, source) but does not.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action: 'Delete a page by id.' It uses a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like create, update, or get. However, it is minimal and does not describe any scope or context beyond the basic action.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, when not to delete, or provide any context about typical scenarios. For a destructive action, explicit usage advice is missing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/margus/wikijs-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server