serper-search-scrape-mcp-server
The serper-search-scrape-mcp-server enables web search and webpage scraping via Serper API, integrating with Claude Desktop and other clients.
Web Search Capabilities:
Rich Google search results including organic listings, knowledge graph, and "people also ask" sections
Region (
gl), language (hl), and location targetingAdvanced search operators:
site,filetype,inurl,intitle,related,cache,before,afterTime filtering (
tbs) and result paginationSupport for exact phrase matching, term exclusion, and OR operators
Scraping Features:
Extract text content from webpages
Optional markdown output format
Retrieve JSON-LD and head metadata
Preserve document structure
Integration & Deployment:
Compatible with Claude Desktop, Smithery, Cline, and Cursor
Docker support for containerized deployment
MCP Inspector for debugging
Provides web search capabilities via Serper API with rich search results, including organic results, knowledge graph, 'people also ask', and related searches from Google.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@serper-search-scrape-mcp-serversearch for recent AI advancements in healthcare"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Serper Search and Scrape MCP Server
A TypeScript-based MCP server that provides web search and webpage scraping capabilities using the Serper API. This server integrates with Claude Desktop to enable powerful web search and content extraction features.
Features
Tools
google_search- Perform web searches via Serper APIRich search results including organic results, knowledge graph, "people also ask", and related searches
Supports region and language targeting
Optional parameters for location, pagination, time filters, and autocorrection
Supports advanced search operators:
site: Limit results to specific domainfiletype: Limit to specific file types (e.g., 'pdf', 'doc')inurl: Search for pages with word in URLintitle: Search for pages with word in titlerelated: Find similar websitescache: View Google's cached version of a specific URLbefore: Date before in YYYY-MM-DD formatafter: Date after in YYYY-MM-DD formatexact: Exact phrase matchexclude: Terms to exclude from search resultsor: Alternative terms (OR operator)
scrape- Extract content from web pagesGet plain text and optional markdown content
Includes JSON-LD and head metadata
Preserves document structure
Related MCP server: go_serper_mcp_server
Requirements
Node.js >= 18
Serper API key (set as
SERPER_API_KEYenvironment variable)
Development
Install dependencies:
npm installBuild the server:
npm run buildFor development with auto-rebuild:
npm run watchRun tests:
npm test # Run all tests
npm run test:watch # Run tests in watch mode
npm run test:coverage # Run tests with coverage
npm run test:integration # Run integration testsEnvironment Variables
Create a .env file in the root directory:
SERPER_API_KEY=your_api_key_hereDebugging
Since MCP servers communicate over stdio, debugging can be challenging. We recommend using the MCP Inspector, which is available as a package script:
npm run inspectorThe Inspector will provide a URL to access debugging tools in your browser.
Installation
Installing via Smithery
To install Serper Search and Scrape for Claude Desktop automatically via Smithery:
npx -y @smithery/cli install @marcopesani/mcp-server-serper --client claudeClaude Desktop
Add the server config at:
MacOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonWindows:
%APPDATA%/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"serper-search": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "serper-search-scrape-mcp-server"],
"env": {
"SERPER_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here"
}
}
}
}Cline
Open the Cline extension settings
Open "MCP Servers" tab
Click on "Configure MCP Servers"
Add the server config:
{
"mcpServers": {
"github.com/marcopesani/mcp-server-serper": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "serper-search-scrape-mcp-server"],
"env": {
"SERPER_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here"
},
"disabled": false,
"autoApprove": ["google_search", "scrape"]
}
}
}Additional Cline configuration options:
disabled: Set tofalseto enable the serverautoApprove: List of tools that don't require explicit approval for each use
Cursor
Open the Cursor settings
Open "Features" settings
In the "MCP Servers" section, click on "Add new MCP Server"
Choose a name, and select "command" as "Type"
In the "Command" field, enter the following:
env SERPER_API_KEY=your_api_key_here npx -y serper-search-scrape-mcp-serverDocker
You can also run the server using Docker. First, build the image:
docker build -t mcp-server-serper .Then run the container with your Serper API key:
docker run -e SERPER_API_KEY=your_api_key_here mcp-server-serperAlternatively, if you have your environment variables in a .env file:
docker run --env-file .env mcp-server-serperFor development, you might want to mount your source code as a volume:
docker run -v $(pwd):/app --env-file .env mcp-server-serperNote: Make sure to replace your_api_key_here with your actual Serper API key.
Available Tools
2 toolsgoogle_searchC
Tool to perform web searches via Serper API and retrieve rich results. It is able to retrieve organic search results, people also ask, related searches, and knowledge graph.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| q | Yes | Search query string (e.g., 'artificial intelligence', 'climate change solutions') | |
| gl | Yes | Optional region code for search results in ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 format (e.g., 'us', 'gb', 'de') | |
| hl | Yes | Optional language code for search results in ISO 639-1 format (e.g., 'en', 'es', 'fr') | |
| location | No | Optional location for search results (e.g., 'SoHo, New York, United States', 'California, United States') | |
| num | No | Number of results to return (default: 10) | |
| tbs | No | Time-based search filter ('qdr:h' for past hour, 'qdr:d' for past day, 'qdr:w' for past week, 'qdr:m' for past month, 'qdr:y' for past year) | |
| page | No | Page number of results to return (default: 1) | |
| autocorrect | No | Whether to autocorrect spelling in query | |
| site | No | Limit results to specific domain (e.g., 'github.com', 'wikipedia.org') | |
| filetype | No | Limit to specific file types (e.g., 'pdf', 'doc', 'xls') | |
| inurl | No | Search for pages with word in URL (e.g., 'download', 'tutorial') | |
| intitle | No | Search for pages with word in title (e.g., 'review', 'how to') | |
| related | No | Find similar websites (e.g., 'github.com', 'stackoverflow.com') | |
| cache | No | View Google's cached version of a specific URL (e.g., 'example.com/page') | |
| before | No | Date before in YYYY-MM-DD format (e.g., '2024-01-01') | |
| after | No | Date after in YYYY-MM-DD format (e.g., '2023-01-01') | |
| exact | No | Exact phrase match (e.g., 'machine learning', 'quantum computing') | |
| exclude | No | Terms to exclude from search results as comma-separated string (e.g., 'spam,ads', 'beginner,basic') | |
| or | No | Alternative terms as comma-separated string (e.g., 'tutorial,guide,course', 'documentation,manual') |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions the tool 'retrieves rich results' but lacks critical details: it doesn't specify rate limits, authentication requirements, error handling, pagination behavior, or whether it's read-only or mutative. For a complex search tool with 19 parameters, this is a significant gap in transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is appropriately concise with two sentences that efficiently convey the core functionality. It's front-loaded with the main purpose and follows with specific result types. There's no wasted verbiage, though it could potentially benefit from more structured formatting given the tool's complexity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (19 parameters), lack of annotations, and absence of an output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what the return values look like, how results are structured, error conditions, or performance characteristics. For a search tool with rich parameter options, users need more context about what to expect from the operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 100%, with all 19 parameters well-documented in the input schema. The description doesn't add any parameter-specific information beyond what's already in the schema. According to guidelines, when schema coverage is high (>80%), the baseline score is 3 even without parameter details in the description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool performs web searches via Serper API and retrieves rich results, specifying organic search results, people also ask, related searches, and knowledge graph. It uses specific verbs ('perform', 'retrieve') and identifies the resource (web searches). However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from the sibling 'scrape' tool, which might have overlapping functionality.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus the sibling 'scrape' tool or other alternatives. It mentions the types of results retrieved but offers no context about appropriate use cases, prerequisites, or exclusions. This leaves the agent without clear decision-making criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
scrapeC
Tool to scrape a webpage and retrieve the text and, optionally, the markdown content. It will retrieve also the JSON-LD metadata and the head metadata.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | The URL of the webpage to scrape. | |
| includeMarkdown | No | Whether to include markdown content. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states what the tool retrieves (text, markdown, JSON-LD, head metadata) but lacks critical behavioral details such as rate limits, authentication needs, error handling, or whether it performs destructive actions (e.g., modifying data). For a web scraping tool with no annotation coverage, this is a significant gap in transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise and front-loaded in a single sentence, efficiently stating the core functionality without unnecessary details. Every part earns its place, though it could be slightly more structured (e.g., separating outputs). It avoids redundancy and is appropriately sized for the tool's complexity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's moderate complexity (web scraping with two parameters), no annotations, and no output schema, the description is partially complete. It covers what the tool retrieves but misses behavioral aspects like rate limits or error handling. Without an output schema, it should ideally describe return values more explicitly, but it does list the types of content retrieved, providing some context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage, clearly documenting both parameters ('url' and 'includeMarkdown'). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema—it doesn't explain parameter interactions, constraints, or usage examples. With high schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate as the schema handles the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'scrape a webpage and retrieve the text and, optionally, the markdown content. It will retrieve also the JSON-LD metadata and the head metadata.' This specifies the verb (scrape), resource (webpage), and outputs (text, markdown, JSON-LD, head metadata). However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool 'google_search', which likely serves a different purpose (searching vs. scraping).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention the sibling tool 'google_search' or any other scraping-related tools, nor does it specify prerequisites, contexts, or exclusions for usage. This leaves the agent without clear direction on tool selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: google_search is for performing web searches and retrieving search results, while scrape is for extracting content from a specific webpage. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the right tool for each task.
Both tools follow a consistent naming pattern using snake_case with descriptive, action-oriented names (google_search and scrape). The naming is straightforward and predictable, with no deviations or mixed conventions.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a search-and-scrape domain, as it might lack additional utilities like batch processing, advanced filtering, or result summarization. However, the core functions are covered, making it borderline but functional.
The tools cover the essential workflows for search and scraping: performing searches and extracting webpage content. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool for managing search history or handling pagination, but agents can work around these with the provided tools.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Serper MCP — wraps the Serper Google Search API (serper.dev)
MCP server for Google search results via SERP API
SEO MCP server for keyword research, SERP analysis, audits, and Search Console workflows.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates with SerpApi to retrieve search results from multiple search engines including Google, Bing, Yahoo, and others, enabling fast access to both live and archived search data.165MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Go-based MCP server that provides comprehensive access to the Serper Google Search API, including tools for images, news, maps, and scholar results. It also features a dedicated endpoint for scraping webpage content directly.10MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates the SearXNG API for web search and URL content extraction with advanced features like pagination, caching, and proxy support.414,6402MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates the SearXNG API to provide web search with pagination, filtering, and URL content extraction.18MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/marcopesani/mcp-server-serper'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server