SerpApi MCP Server
SerpApi MCP Server lets AI assistants run live search queries across many engines and get structured results, with options for compact JSON or Markdown and interactive UI tables/dashboards.
Universal search across engines: Google (incl. flights, hotels, images, news, local, shopping, jobs, light), Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, YouTube, eBay, Baidu, Amazon, Apple App Store, Google Scholar, and more.
Flexible result formats: Full or compact JSON, or Markdown to reduce token usage.
Engine discovery via resources: List engines and inspect engine-specific parameters through
serpapi://enginesandserpapi://engines/<engine>.Interactive UI tools:
search_tablerenders results as a sortable/searchable table;search_dashboardshows summary metrics, charts, and a results table in MCP Apps hosts.Real-time data lookups: Weather, stock/market data, news, products, jobs, local businesses, flights, hotels, and more.
Guided search: Automatically asks for missing required parameters (e.g., flight airports/dates, hotel check-in/out, directions endpoints) in supporting clients.
Authentication & deployment flexibility: Hosted HTTP endpoint with header or path API key, or self-hosted local stdio/HTTP server; no key needed for listing tools/resources.
Retrieves parsed search results from Baidu search engine via SerpApi
Performs searches on DuckDuckGo and retrieves parsed search results via SerpApi
Retrieves parsed search results from eBay marketplace via SerpApi
Manages environment variables for the MCP server, specifically for storing and accessing the SerpApi API key
Performs searches on Google and retrieves parsed search results pages via SerpApi
Retrieves parsed search results from Walmart online store via SerpApi
Performs searches on YouTube and retrieves parsed video search results via SerpApi
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@SerpApi MCP Serversearch for best coffee shops in Seattle with outdoor seating"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
SerpApi MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation that integrates with SerpApi for comprehensive search engine results and data extraction.
Features
Multi-Engine Search: Google, Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, YouTube, eBay, and more
Engine Resources: Per-engine parameter schemas available via MCP resources (see Search Tool)
Real-time Weather Data: Location-based weather with forecasts via search queries
Stock Market Data: Company financials and market data through search integration
Dynamic Result Processing: Automatically detects and formats different result types
Flexible Response Modes: Complete or compact JSON responses
JSON Responses (default): Structured JSON output with complete or compact modes
Markdown Responses: Cut token usage by 50% on average and by more than 90% for APIs with complex nested JSON.
Interactive UI (MCP Apps): Opt-in
search_tableandsearch_dashboardtools that render results as an interactive UI in supporting hostsClaude Desktop Extension: One-click local install from an MCP Bundle (
.mcpb), see below
Related MCP server: SearXNG MCP Server
Quick Start
SerpApi MCP Server is available as a hosted service at mcp.serpapi.com. In order to connect to it, you need to provide an API key. You can find your API key on your SerpApi dashboard.
You can configure Claude Desktop to use the hosted server:
{
"mcpServers": {
"serpapi": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.serpapi.com/YOUR_SERPAPI_API_KEY/mcp"
}
}
}You can also add the hosted server to these MCP clients:
OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add serpapi --url https://mcp.serpapi.com/YOUR_SERPAPI_API_KEY/mcp --transport streamable-httpClaude Code
claude mcp add --transport http serpapi https://mcp.serpapi.com/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_SERPAPI_API_KEY"Hermes
hermes mcp add serpapi --url https://mcp.serpapi.com/YOUR_SERPAPI_API_KEY/mcpCodex (reads the key from SERPAPI_API_KEY in your shell)
codex mcp add serpapi --url https://mcp.serpapi.com/mcp --bearer-token-env-var SERPAPI_API_KEYSelf-Hosting
git clone https://github.com/serpapi/serpapi-mcp.git
cd serpapi-mcp
uv sync && uv run src/server.pyConfigure Claude Desktop:
{
"mcpServers": {
"serpapi": {
"type": "http",
"url": "http://localhost:8000/YOUR_SERPAPI_API_KEY/mcp"
}
}
}Get your API key: serpapi.com/manage-api-key
Claude Desktop Extension (MCP Bundle)
For a local, one-click install, download the .mcpb bundle from the latest release (or build it as below) and open it with Claude Desktop (or drop it onto Settings → Extensions). Claude Desktop asks for your SerpApi API key during install, stores it as a sensitive setting, and runs the server locally over stdio. The bundle uses the MCPB uv runtime: it ships only the source, pyproject.toml and uv.lock, and Claude Desktop provisions Python and the locked dependencies with uv at install time, so nothing is vendored and one bundle works on macOS, Windows and Linux.
uv run mcpb/build.py # needs Node.js for the MCPB CLI; writes dist/serpapi-mcp-<version>.mcpbEverything bundle-related lives in mcpb/, plus .mcpbignore at the project root. The build regenerates the engine schemas from the SerpApi Playground (--no-rebuild-engines bundles engines/ from the working tree instead), validates mcpb/manifest.json, packs the git-tracked files minus .mcpbignore with the manifest at the bundle root, then installs it into a temp dir and starts it over stdio to make sure it works (--no-smoke skips that last step). The bundle is only built at release time: pushing a v<version> tag runs the release workflow, which runs the test suite and then deploys the hosted server, publishes the MCP Registry entry, and builds the bundle and attaches it to the GitHub release. Pull requests run the manifest and stdio entry point tests in tests/test_mcpb.py but do not pack a bundle.
The same stdio entry point works with any local MCP host that launches servers as a subprocess:
{
"mcpServers": {
"serpapi": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "--directory", "/path/to/serpapi-mcp", "--frozen", "--no-dev", "src/stdio.py"],
"env": { "SERPAPI_API_KEY": "YOUR_SERPAPI_API_KEY" }
}
}
}Authentication
Two methods are supported:
Header-based:
Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY(recommended: the key stays out of URLs and logs)Path-based:
/YOUR_API_KEY/mcp, for clients that cannot set headers
Examples:
# Header-based
curl "https://mcp.serpapi.com/mcp" -H "Authorization: Bearer your_key" -d '...'
# Path-based
curl "https://mcp.serpapi.com/your_key/mcp" -d '...'No key is needed to connect, list tools or read resources. search and the App tools need one and return an error without it.
Search Tool
The MCP server has one main Search Tool that supports all SerpApi engines and result types. You can find all available parameters on the SerpApi API reference.
Engine parameter schemas are also exposed as MCP resources: serpapi://engines (index) and serpapi://engines/<engine>.
Clients that support argument completion can request engine-name suggestions for serpapi://engines/{engine_name}. For example, the prefix google_f suggests matching engine identifiers. This completes the resource URI parameter, not arbitrary search queries.
The parameters you can provide are specific for each API engine. Some sample parameters are provided below:
params.q(required): Search queryparams.engine: Search engine (default: "google_light")params.location: Geographic filterparams.output: Response format; omit for JSON (default), or set to"md"for Markdownmode: Response mode;"compact"removes metadata from JSON, while Markdown is returned unchanged...see other parameters on the SerpApi API reference
Examples:
{"name": "search", "arguments": {"params": {"q": "coffee shops", "location": "Austin, TX"}}}
{"name": "search", "arguments": {"params": {"q": "weather in London"}}}
{"name": "search", "arguments": {"params": {"q": "AAPL stock"}}}
{"name": "search", "arguments": {"params": {"q": "news"}, "mode": "compact"}}
{"name": "search", "arguments": {"params": {"q": "detailed search"}, "mode": "complete"}}
{"name": "search", "arguments": {"params": {"q": "news", "output": "md"}}}
{"name": "search", "arguments": {"params": {"engine": "amazon", "k": "mechanical keyboards", "amazon_domain": "amazon.com", "output": "md"}}}
{"name": "search", "arguments": {"params": {"engine": "google_scholar", "q": "retrieval augmented generation"}}}
{"name": "search", "arguments": {"params": {"engine": "youtube", "search_query": "how to make espresso"}}}
{"name": "search", "arguments": {"params": {"engine": "apple_app_store", "term": "habit tracker"}}}
{"name": "search", "arguments": {"params": {"engine": "ebay", "_nkw": "vintage mechanical keyboard"}}}Supported Engines: Google, Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, YouTube, eBay, and more (see serpapi://engines).
Result Types: Answer boxes, organic results, news, images, shopping - automatically detected and formatted.
Search responses preserve the existing MCP structuredContent.result string and include the same string in text content. For JSON output, result contains serialized JSON; existing clients can continue parsing it with JSON.parse(response.structuredContent.result). For Markdown output, it contains the unchanged Markdown. Errors and cancellations use the same wrapper. Search execution failures set isError: true; clients using FastMCP's high-level call_tool() should handle ToolError, or use call_tool_mcp() to inspect the result flag. See MCP tool results.
search uses the engine catalog and engine-specific rules to identify missing parameters. Supporting MCP 2026-07-28 clients receive a form before any search runs. Accepted answers are validated; decline or cancellation runs no search. Legacy clients and clients without form elicitation receive an error listing the missing parameters so the agent can ask in conversation. See MCP input requests.
Google Flights: departure and arrival identifiers, departure date, and a return date for round trips. Dates and airport identifiers are checked. Token-based searches, multi-city itineraries, and
selected_flights_jsonretain their existing behavior.Google Hotels: destination or hotel query, check-in date, and check-out date. Check-out must follow check-in. Guest counts and other optional filters keep the caller's values or the API defaults.
Google Maps Directions: missing start and destination addresses. Coordinates or place data IDs already supplied satisfy the corresponding endpoint.
Other catalog engines use their required fields, such as YouTube's
search_query, Yelp'sfind_loc, and Amazon'sk. Engine rules account for known defaults and alternatives, including Amazon category nodes, eBay categories, and Google Scholar citation searches.
The form is derived from the original arguments on each request. It uses no requestState or process-local continuation storage, so a retry can run on another replica without a shared state-protection key. Authentication is applied on every HTTP request, and only answers for requested fields are used. If an answer introduces another requirement, the tool lists the remaining fields for the agent to supply in a new call.
To extend guided search, add required fields, descriptions, types, and options to the engine's engines/<engine>.json file. Add an EngineInputRules entry in src/engine_input_rules.py when requirements depend on other parameters, defaults, or alternatives. The shared MCP handler in src/search_input.py needs no engine-specific branches. Forms support strings, numbers, booleans, and single-choice fields; unsupported complex fields receive the missing-parameter error. Unknown engines pass through to SerpApi.
Interactive UI (MCP Apps)
The search tool returns JSON by default. For hosts that support the MCP Apps extension (SEP-1865), two opt-in tools render results as an interactive UI directly in the conversation, so the bulk SERP JSON never enters the model's context window:
search_table: organic results as a sortable, searchable table.search_dashboard: summary metrics, a source-breakdown chart, and a results table with a click-to-expand detail panel.
Both accept the same params as search. Hosts that don't support MCP Apps simply ignore these tools.
Preview them locally without an MCP host:
uv run fastmcp dev apps src/server.pyDevelopment
# Local development
uv sync && uv run src/server.py
# Docker
docker build -t serpapi-mcp . && docker run -p 8000:8000 serpapi-mcp
# Build the Claude Desktop extension (MCP Bundle); rebuilds engines, needs Node.js for the MCPB CLI
uv run mcpb/build.py
# Release: update pyproject.toml, server.json, mcpb/manifest.json and uv.lock together.
uv run --no-sync scripts/bump_version.py 2.0.0
# Review and commit the changes before tagging the release.
# Nothing ships on a plain push to main. The tag runs the release workflow, which runs the test
# suite and then deploys the hosted server, publishes server.json to the MCP Registry, and builds
# the MCP Bundle and attaches it to the GitHub release.
git tag v2.0.0 && git push origin v2.0.0
# Regenerate engine resources (Playground scrape)
python build-engines.py
# Testing with MCP Inspector
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector
# Configure: URL mcp.serpapi.com/YOUR_KEY/mcp, Transport "Streamable HTTP transport"Troubleshooting
"Missing API key": Include key in URL path
/{YOUR_KEY}/mcpor headerBearer YOUR_KEY"Invalid key": Verify at serpapi.com/dashboard
"Rate limit exceeded": Wait or upgrade your SerpApi plan
"No results": Try different query or engine
Privacy Policy
Sent: only the parameters the MCP host passes to a tool call. The server never sees the rest of the conversation, or files, memory or history on the host.
Forwarded: each search goes to
serpapi.comwith your API key; results come back unchanged. See the SerpApi Privacy Policy for how SerpApi handles searches and accounts.Kept:
mcp.serpapi.comrecords request metrics (method, status code, duration) and stores no queries or results. A key in the URL path can appear in request logs, so prefer the header.Local bundle: the Claude Desktop extension runs on your machine, keeps the key in Claude Desktop's settings and calls
serpapi.comdirectly. Nothing passes throughmcp.serpapi.com.Contact: privacy@serpapi.com, or open an issue.
Contributing
Fork the repository
Create your feature branch:
git checkout -b feature/amazing-featureInstall dependencies:
uv installMake your changes
Commit changes:
git commit -m 'Add amazing feature'Push to branch:
git push origin feature/amazing-featureOpen a Pull Request
License
MIT License - see LICENSE file for details.
Available Tools
3 toolssearchSerpApi searchARead-only
Universal search tool supporting all SerpApi engines and result types.
When to use:
- Any query needing live, structured SERP data: web results, news, product listings, job postings, local businesses, flight/hotel prices, video results, images, stock/weather cards, knowledge graph entities.
Engine discovery via MCP resources:
- serpapi://engines lists all engines supported by this tool.
- serpapi://engines/<engine> provides engine-specific parameters and supported options.
- Example: serpapi://engines/google_news
Input schema:
params: JSON object containing SerpApi engine parameters.
Common parameters:
- q: Search query. Required for most engines.
- engine: SerpApi engine name. Defaults to "google_light".
- location: Optional geographic location for localized results.
- output: Optional response format. Omit for JSON (default), or set to "md" for Markdown.
Engine-specific parameters are available via MCP resources:
- serpapi://engines lists all supported engines.
- serpapi://engines/<engine> provides parameters and options for one engine.
mode: Response mode. Defaults to "complete".
- "complete": Return the full SerpApi response.
- "compact": Remove metadata fields from JSON responses. Markdown is returned unchanged.
Output schema:
structuredContent.result contains the response string: serialized JSON or unchanged Markdown.
The same string is included in text content. Tool failures preserve this wrapper and set isError to true.
Guided search:
Searches can request missing engine parameters from supporting clients using the engine catalog and engine-specific rules.
Flights collect airports and dates, hotels collect the destination and stay dates, and directions collect missing endpoints.
Other clients receive a missing-parameter error. Cancellation does not run a search.
Examples:
Weather: {"params": {"q": "weather in London", "engine": "google"}, "mode": "complete"}
Stock: {"params": {"q": "AAPL stock", "engine": "google"}, "mode": "complete"}
General: {"params": {"q": "coffee shops", "engine": "google_light", "location": "Austin, TX"}, "mode": "complete"}
Compact: {"params": {"q": "news"}, "mode": "compact"}
Markdown: {"params": {"q": "news", "output": "md"}}
Supported engines include (not limited to):
- google
- google_light
- google_flights
- google_hotels
- google_images
- google_news
- google_local
- google_shopping
- google_jobs
- bing
- yahoo
- duckduckgo
- youtube_search
- baidu
- ebay
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mode | No | Response mode (default: "complete") - "complete": Returns the full response - "compact": Removes metadata fields from JSON responses; Markdown is unchanged | complete |
| params | No | Dictionary of SerpApi engine-specific parameters. Common parameters include: - q: Search query (required for most engines) - engine: Search engine to use (default: "google_light") - location: Geographic location filter - output: Response format; omit for JSON or set to "md" for Markdown |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, and the description adds substantial behavioral context beyond that: compact versus complete response modes, Markdown behavior, output wrapper structure, guided-search interaction for missing parameters, cancellation semantics, and failure wrapper behavior. This goes well beyond what annotations or schema alone provide.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is long but well-organized with clear sections, bullet lists, and examples. The engine-discovery instructions are repeated twice, which is mildly redundant, but the overall structure is scannable and every major section earns its place given the tool's breadth.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a broad, engine-flexible tool, the description is remarkably complete: it covers when to use the tool, how to discover supported engines, parameter conventions, response modes, output schema, guided-search behavior, and realistic examples. With a rich output schema and annotations present, no critical operational detail is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds meaningful guidance beyond the schema: it explains which parameters are common, notes 'q' is required for most engines, gives concrete JSON examples, and points to MCP resources for engine-specific parameter discovery. This helps an agent construct valid params far better than the raw schema alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb and resource: a universal search tool covering 'all SerpApi engines and result types.' It clearly enumerates the kinds of live structured SERP data it retrieves. However, it never explicitly contrasts itself with the sibling tools search_dashboard and search_table, so the differentiation is implicit rather than stated.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The 'When to use' section explicitly lists concrete scenarios such as web results, news, product listings, flights, and videos, giving an agent clear selection criteria. It does not mention when not to use the tool or point to sibling alternatives, but the listed conditions are specific enough to guide invocation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_dashboardSerpApi search (dashboard)ARead-only
Interactive dashboard variant of search: returns summary metrics, a source breakdown chart, and a results table with a click-to-expand detail panel, all rendered in the conversation. Same params as search. Use for a richer visual overview of a query's results. Automatically selects an engine-specific dashboard when available (e.g. google_flights gets price intelligence charting).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| params | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already cover read-only, non-destructive, and open-world hints. The description adds behavior beyond these: it describes the interactive rendering in conversation and the automatic selection of engine-specific dashboards (e.g., google_flights), which is valuable context. No contradiction with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Three sentences with zero fluff. The key differentiator (dashboard variant) is front-loaded, followed by output details and usage guidance. Every sentence earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a variant tool, the description is complete: it states what it returns, when to use it, and where to get parameter details. It does not mention pagination or error handling, but these are not critical for a read-only dashboard tool with annotations already covering safety.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has one opaque `params` object with 0% coverage. The description compensates by stating 'Same params as `search`', directing the agent to the sibling's schema for parameter details. This is a pragmatic and effective way to convey parameter meaning.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it is an interactive dashboard variant of `search`, enumerating the specific outputs (summary metrics, source breakdown chart, results table with expandable detail panel). This distinguishes it from the sibling tools `search` and `search_table` without ambiguity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It says 'Use for a richer visual overview of a query's results', giving clear context for when to select this tool. It also notes 'Same params as `search`', implying the simpler `search` tool may be used for non-visual needs, though it does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_tableSerpApi search (table)ARead-only
Interactive UI variant of search: returns organic results as a sortable, searchable table rendered in the conversation. Same params as search. Use when the host supports MCP Apps and the user wants to browse results visually rather than read JSON.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| params | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and destructiveHint, covering the safety profile. The description adds useful behavioral context beyond that: results are organic, the table is sortable/searchable, it renders in the conversation, and it depends on MCP Apps support. No contradiction with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences with no filler. The first sentence front-loads the core purpose and sibling relationship; the second gives the usage condition. Every clause earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a thin wrapper around `search`, the description covers purpose, differentiation, when to use it, and the parameter relationship. Annotations cover read-only safety, and there is no output schema to document. It only lacks explicit handling of what happens when the host lacks MCP Apps support, and its parameter semantics depend on the parent tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has a single opaque `params` object with additionalProperties true and 0% description coverage, so the description must compensate. Saying 'Same params as `search`' adds meaning by reference and tells the agent to reuse another tool's parameter definitions, but it does not enumerate or describe those parameters, leaving the payload underspecified.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's behavior: it returns organic results as an interactive, sortable/searchable table rendered in the conversation. It explicitly positions itself as a 'variant of `search`', which distinguishes it from the sibling tool without needing to open any schemas.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives a concrete use condition: 'Use when the host supports MCP Apps and the user wants to browse results visually rather than read JSON.' It points to the alternative `search`, but does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or address the `search_dashboard` sibling, so it stops short of fully explicit routing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
v2.0.0- Changed
search3 fields changed- removed
Input schema / properties / params / additionalPropertiesRemoved value: -true - added
Input schema / properties / params / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / params / typeRemoved value: -"object"
3 tool updates
v1.0.3- First observed
search - First observed
search_dashboard - First observed
search_table
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools are clearly labeled as base search, dashboard, and table variants, with descriptions explaining when to use each. However, they all wrap the same underlying SerpApi search, so semantic overlap is inherent and an agent must rely on the presentation-focused descriptions to select correctly.
All tool names follow a consistent pattern: the base 'search' plus descriptive 'search_dashboard' and 'search_table' variants. There is no mixing of naming conventions or styles.
Three tools is minimal but appropriate for a search API wrapper: one universal search operation and two UI presentation variants. The count is lean but not deficient.
The search tool covers all SerpApi engines and output modes, so the core domain is fully covered with no dead ends. Minor gaps like explicit pagination or account-related operations are not exposed, but they are not essential to the server's purpose.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Official SerpApi MCP server for Google, Bing, and other search engines.
MCP server for Google search results via SERP API
Serper MCP — wraps the Serper Google Search API (serper.dev)
SerpApi MCP — wraps SerpApi (serpapi.com) search engines
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates with the SearXNG API to provide comprehensive web search capabilities with features like time filtering, language selection, and safe search. It also enables users to fetch and convert web content from specific URLs into markdown format.210 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables web search capabilities by integrating with a SearXNG instance to aggregate results from over 130 engines. It allows users to perform filtered searches across categories like news, science, and social media while supporting advanced parameters for language and time range.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates the SearXNG API for web search and URL content extraction with advanced features like pagination, caching, and proxy support.48,974 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates the SearXNG API to provide web search with pagination, filtering, and URL content extraction.7 npmMIT