caesar_decrypt

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It does not disclose handling of non-alphabetic characters, case sensitivity, or edge cases. Only states a straightforward decryption.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise, uses docstring format with Args/Returns. Two sentences for purpose plus parameter descriptions, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple Caesar cipher tool, description covers the essentials. Could mention letter-only handling or case, but output schema exists and context is mostly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema_description_coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It provides basic explanations for ciphertext and shift, but no constraints (e.g., shift range 1-25) or format details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool decrypts ciphertext using the Caesar cipher with a known shift. It distinguishes itself from siblings like caesar_crack (which cracks without known shift) and caesar_encrypt.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., caesar_crack if shift unknown, rot13 for fixed shift). No exclusions or context for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.