Skip to main content
Glama
marc-shade

Crypto Tools MCP Server

by marc-shade

Related Servers

Alternatives to Crypto Tools MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform quantum-resistant cryptographic operations using NIST-standardized algorithms including ML-KEM, ML-DSA, and SPHINCS+. Supports key generation, encryption, digital signatures, and security analysis for post-quantum cryptography research and development.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables cryptographic operations including hashing, encoding/decoding, ID generation, password tools, and JWT inspection via MCP.
      5
      37 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables enterprise MCP security auditing through 12 deterministic no-LLM tools for evidence-gated claims, skill/prompt supply-chain audits, token profiling, and server auth-mode checks.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for sovereign AES-256-GCM backup encryption and decryption. Enables encrypting, decrypting, verifying, and scoring passphrases with zero network calls.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enterprise MCP gateway suite providing 22 unified tools across hardware telemetry, security auditing, AES-256-GCM encrypted storage, HMAC verification, and Amazon Bedrock media generation.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes: Caesar encrypt/decrypt/crack are clearly different; Vigenere and XOR similarly. Compliance tools (FIPS, CNSA, PQC, combined report) overlap somewhat but descriptions clarify their scope. A few analytical tools (frequency_analysis, detect_cipher_type) are distinct. Overall, minimal confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are all lowercase with underscores. Most follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., generate_key, check_fips_compliance). However, 'frequency_analysis' uses noun_noun and 'rot13' is just a name, deviating from the pattern. Predominantly consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is slightly above the ideal range (3-15) but still reasonable for the breadth of coverage: classical ciphers, compliance, key management, and analysis. Not excessive; each tool serves a clear function.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers classical ciphers and compliance/audit well, but lacks modern cryptographic operations (AES encryption, hashing, digital signatures). Key management is about metadata, not key pair generation. These are notable gaps for a 'crypto tools' server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues