Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
MAPLE_STORENogithub, or file for comments under .maple/ on this machine.
GITHUB_TOKENNoToken that reads and writes the repository's pull request comments. Required for the github store.
MAPLE_GITHUB_REPONoThe repository. Required for the github store.
MAPLE_GITHUB_OWNERNoThe repository's owner. Required for the github store.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
list_commentsB

Return the review comments on a branch, newest first.

wait_for_commentsA

Block until a new comment arrives or the wait elapses. Returns status "timeout" rather than failing when nothing arrives.

resolve_commentB

Mark a comment resolved, recording the commit that addressed it.

get_comment_contextA

Return everything needed to act on one comment: anchor, viewport, surrounding markup and any replay link. A comment written under a Maple Mock carries mock.recipe and mock.replay, a link to the page in that state.

start_soloA

Start a bridge on localhost and return the link that pairs a deployed preview with it. The reviewer opens the link in their browser and the comments they write there land in .maple/ for list_comments and wait_for_comments to read. They never count toward the merge gate.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation in the review-comment workflow: listing existing comments, blocking for new ones, resolving a comment, fetching detailed context for one comment, and starting a local bridge. There is no meaningful overlap between these purposes.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names use snake_case and follow a verb-led pattern (list_comments, wait_for_comments, resolve_comment, get_comment_context, start_solo). The convention is consistent throughout.

Tool Count5/5

Five tools is well-scoped for a specialized review-comment bridge server. Each tool serves a clear, non-redundant role in the workflow.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers reading, waiting for, resolving, and getting context on comments, plus starting the bridge. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit unresolve or reply operation, but core workflows are fully supported.

Maintenance

ActivityNo data
ResponsivenessResponsive