Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to maple

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Turns product feedback pinned to a live UI into an actionable backlog for Claude Code — list comments, open one with its target element's HTML, computed styles and screenshot, and update its status.
      4
      67,614,124 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to pull structured UI feedback captured in the browser — including element selectors, bounding boxes, computed styles, screenshots, and annotations — and to mark issues as fixed.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to capture pixel-accurate screenshots and DOM state from localhost apps, receive user-drawn instructions and reference images, and manage implementation review cycles.
      11 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Human-to-AI code review bridge. Annotate UI elements in the browser with review comments, and AI agents read the feedback via MCP to fix code automatically — with full element context (CSS selector, styles, DOM path, accessibility info). 10 MCP tools, framework-agnostic Web Component, zero-config install via uvx.
      9
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Lets AI agents read frame-accurate video review notes — timestamps, frames, annotations, and pointing targets tied to source elements — so they can fix rendered videos and re-check the results. Supports listing reviews, retrieving annotated frames, watching for new feedback, acknowledging, replying, resolving, dismissing, and leaving their own critique notes.
      153 npm
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation in the review-comment workflow: listing existing comments, blocking for new ones, resolving a comment, fetching detailed context for one comment, and starting a local bridge. There is no meaningful overlap between these purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use snake_case and follow a verb-led pattern (list_comments, wait_for_comments, resolve_comment, get_comment_context, start_solo). The convention is consistent throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a specialized review-comment bridge server. Each tool serves a clear, non-redundant role in the workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers reading, waiting for, resolving, and getting context on comments, plus starting the bridge. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit unresolve or reply operation, but core workflows are fully supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessResponsive