ARCL CYD Desktop MCP bridge
Related Servers
Alternatives to ARCL CYD Desktop MCP bridge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for controlling MicroPython devices (ESP32, RP2040, etc.) via USB Serial or WebREPL, enabling code execution, file operations, and device management from MCP clients.299-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables local, cloud-free control of a Uitree Portal APK via 27 MCP tools for UI tree inspection, screenshots, tapping/swiping, input, clipboard, app/file management, APK installation, and keep-awake.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with ESP32/MicroPython boards via tools for flashing firmware, running REPL code, file management, and serial capture, with support for progress notifications, cancellation, and error handling.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables remote control of Android devices via ADB, including screen operations, input, app management, file transfer, and advanced tools like UI testing and performance analysis.24MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables full control of a Flipper Zero device over USB, including screenshots, radio protocols, and app development without requiring a COM port.35MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for controlling an ESP32-C3 PetOS watch over BLE. Enables scanning, connecting, sending pet actions, and showing frames through MCP tools.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 42 tools
Most tools map to a distinct subsystem and action, and descriptions clearly separate closely related groups like app listing versus installed MicroPython apps. The main ambiguity is an explicit alias (cyd_launch/cyd_activate) and a few read-versus-clear or launch-versus-script variants, but descriptions mostly prevent misselection.
Names largely follow a consistent cyd_<subsystem>_<action> pattern with snake_case throughout. Minor deviations such as noun-only names (cyd_logs, cyd_diagnostics) and the common arcl_status tool keep it from being perfectly uniform.
42 tools is well above the comfortable MCP tool count and will be heavy for an agent to navigate. Many fine-grained operations could be consolidated into parameterized tools, and the launch/activate alias inflates the count further.
The surface covers core device control well: UI observation, input synthesis, app lifecycle, settings, Bluetooth, radio, and shortcuts. Minor gaps like an explicit app-stop or standalone reboot tool and generic SD file browsing prevent a perfect score.