wordpress_update_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the partial update behavior ('Only provided fields are changed'), which is valuable. However, it omits critical traits like authentication requirements, error handling, or whether the operation is atomic. This is a moderate contribution but lacks completeness.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences that are direct and free of redundancy. Every word earns its place, with the key action and partial update nuance front-loaded. No unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 12 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too sparse. It fails to explain return values, permissions, error conditions, or the scope of changes. The tool is relatively complex (many settings), yet the description provides minimal context beyond the core action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the description must supply parameter meaning. The description only mentions 'general WordPress site settings' with no elaboration on individual parameters. The agent must infer semantics from parameter names alone, which is insufficient for 12 varied parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Update general WordPress site settings.' It uses a specific verb ('update') and resource ('WordPress site settings'), distinguishing it from sibling tools that update pages, posts, or other entities. The additional clause 'Only provided fields are changed' further clarifies the partial update semantics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., wordpress_get_settings for reading, other update tools for different resources). The description does not mention context, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent without decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.