wordpress_list_menus
List all WordPress menus by checking availability of the REST API endpoint.
Instructions
List menus if the WordPress menus REST endpoint is available.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all WordPress menus by checking availability of the REST API endpoint.
List menus if the WordPress menus REST endpoint is available.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description only mentions a condition (endpoint availability) but does not describe behavior when endpoint is unavailable or the structure of the returned data.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff, clearly front-loaded with the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema; description does not describe return values, pagination, or fields of menu objects. The endpoint availability condition is useful but incomplete for understanding the tool's full behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4. Description adds no additional param info, which is acceptable given absence of params.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'list' and the resource 'menus', and differentiates from siblings like wordpress_list_menu_items which lists menu items.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as wordpress_list_menu_items or wordpress_list_pages. The condition about endpoint availability is a prerequisite but not usage comparison.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/manofsadness/ItchWPMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server