Skip to main content
Glama
watsonx Platform MCP Server

watsonx Platform MCP Server

by manjotsidhu

create_project

Creates a watsonx project to organize assets, connections, and jobs, with a required name and optional type, visibility, storage, generator, and description settings.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYes
typeNoSame enum list_projects filters on, e.g. 'cpd'.
publicNo
storageNoEnvironment-specific, opaque pass-through (see spec/04-environment-differences.md). On a `cpd` session, omit this and a {'type': 'assetfiles', 'guid': <uuid4>} is auto-filled — the platform ignores the client-supplied guid and provisions its own. On a `saas` session this is REQUIRED and cannot be auto-filled: {'type': 'bmcos_object_storage', 'guid': <COS instance guid>, 'resource_crn': <real pre-existing COS instance CRN>, 'properties': {'bucket_name': <fresh unique name>, 'bucket_region': ..., 'endpoint_url': ...}}. SaaS calls IBM Cloud's resource controller live against resource_crn and fails hard if it doesn't resolve to a real, accessible COS instance.
generatorNoFree-text product-origin marker, e.g. "CPDCTL-CLI".
descriptionNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

D1/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.