Skip to main content
Glama
mangogogogoman

mcp-auto-build

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
getProjectInfoA

获取项目的基本信息,包括项目名称、类型(前端/后端/未知)和是否有SVN版本控制。

使用场景:

  • 在打包前确认项目类型

  • 检查项目是否有SVN版本信息

buildBackendB

对后端Java项目进行Maven打包,支持若依框架。打包结果为带有日期和SVN版本号的jar文件。

使用场景:

  • 单独对后端项目进行打包

  • 在CI/CD流程中分步执行

buildFrontendA

对前端项目进行npm打包,支持Vue/React等框架。打包结果为带有日期和SVN版本号的zip压缩包。

使用场景:

  • 单独对前端项目进行打包

  • 在CI/CD流程中分步执行

buildPackageA

完整打包工程,包含获取项目信息、获取SVN版本号、执行打包等全部步骤。支持本地工程的打包,打包结果为带有SVN版本的标准格式。

使用场景:

  • 需要一次性完成整个打包流程

  • 简单的打包任务

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation4/5

buildPackage is clearly the full end-to-end workflow, while buildBackend and buildFrontend are explicitly scoped to individual project types. getProjectInfo is distinct as an informational tool, so an agent can choose correctly based on whether a full or partial build is needed. There is minor potential overlap between buildPackage and the specific build tools, but the use-case descriptions resolve it.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent camelCase verb-first pattern: buildPackage, buildBackend, buildFrontend, getProjectInfo. The verbs are descriptive and the naming style is uniform across the entire server.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is well-scoped for a build automation server: one full-build orchestrator, two project-type-specific builders, and one information-gathering tool. Each tool has a clear role, and none feel redundant or missing.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full build lifecycle: retrieving project metadata, building backend projects, building frontend projects, and performing a complete packaged build. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations within the stated build-automation purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues