Skip to main content
Glama
mangogogogoman

mcp-auto-build

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-auto-build

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    buildPackage is clearly the full end-to-end workflow, while buildBackend and buildFrontend are explicitly scoped to individual project types. getProjectInfo is distinct as an informational tool, so an agent can choose correctly based on whether a full or partial build is needed. There is minor potential overlap between buildPackage and the specific build tools, but the use-case descriptions resolve it.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent camelCase verb-first pattern: buildPackage, buildBackend, buildFrontend, getProjectInfo. The verbs are descriptive and the naming style is uniform across the entire server.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a build automation server: one full-build orchestrator, two project-type-specific builders, and one information-gathering tool. Each tool has a clear role, and none feel redundant or missing.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full build lifecycle: retrieving project metadata, building backend projects, building frontend projects, and performing a complete packaged build. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations within the stated build-automation purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues