Delete Furniture

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description adds context beyond annotations: associated documents are also deleted and the action is irreversible. Annotations already indicate destructiveness, so description enriches understanding.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, no fluff, front-loaded with the core action. Very efficient for the information provided.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple delete operation with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the essentials: what is deleted, cascading deletion, and irreversibility. Adequate for the complexity level.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage and no parameter details. The description only says 'par son identifiant', which does not add meaning beyond the schema's property name and type. For a required integer ID, more detail (e.g., where to find the ID) would help.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Supprime'), the resource ('élément de mobilier'), and the identifier method ('par son identifiant'). It also mentions that associated documents are deleted, which distinguishes it from other delete tools among siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use vs alternatives or when not to use. Only mentions irreversibility, which is a behavioral note rather than usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.