Skip to main content
Glama
makenotion
by makenotion

API-retrieve-a-page

Use this tool to retrieve specific Notion pages by their ID and filter page properties to limit responses, enabling precise data extraction from Notion workspaces via the MCP server.

Instructions

Notion | Retrieve a page

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
filter_propertiesNoA list of page property value IDs associated with the page. Use this param to limit the response to a specific page property value or values. To retrieve multiple properties, specify each page property ID. For example: `?filter_properties=iAk8&filter_properties=b7dh`.
page_idYesIdentifier for a Notion page

Implementation Reference

  • The main handler for executing the 'API-retrieve-a-page' tool (and all generated tools). It resolves the tool name to an OpenAPI operation and calls the HTTP client to execute it.
    this.server.setRequestHandler(CallToolRequestSchema, async (request) => {
      const { name, arguments: params } = request.params
    
      // Find the operation in OpenAPI spec
      const operation = this.findOperation(name)
      if (!operation) {
        throw new Error(`Method ${name} not found`)
      }
    
      try {
        // Execute the operation
        const response = await this.httpClient.executeOperation(operation, params)
    
        // Convert response to MCP format
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text', // currently this is the only type that seems to be used by mcp server
              text: JSON.stringify(response.data), // TODO: pass through the http status code text?
            },
          ],
        }
      } catch (error) {
        console.error('Error in tool call', error)
        if (error instanceof HttpClientError) {
          console.error('HttpClientError encountered, returning structured error', error)
          const data = error.data?.response?.data ?? error.data ?? {}
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: 'text',
                text: JSON.stringify({
                  status: 'error', // TODO: get this from http status code?
                  ...(typeof data === 'object' ? data : { data: data }),
                }),
              },
            ],
          }
        }
        throw error
      }
    })
  • Helper function that executes the actual HTTP request for the OpenAPI operation corresponding to the tool, using openapi-client-axios.
    async executeOperation<T = any>(
      operation: OpenAPIV3.OperationObject & { method: string; path: string },
      params: Record<string, any> = {},
    ): Promise<HttpClientResponse<T>> {
      const api = await this.api
      const operationId = operation.operationId
      if (!operationId) {
        throw new Error('Operation ID is required')
      }
    
      // Handle file uploads if present
      const formData = await this.prepareFileUpload(operation, params)
    
      // Separate parameters based on their location
      const urlParameters: Record<string, any> = {}
      const bodyParams: Record<string, any> = formData || { ...params }
    
      // Extract path and query parameters based on operation definition
      if (operation.parameters) {
        for (const param of operation.parameters) {
          if ('name' in param && param.name && param.in) {
            if (param.in === 'path' || param.in === 'query') {
              if (params[param.name] !== undefined) {
                urlParameters[param.name] = params[param.name]
                if (!formData) {
                  delete bodyParams[param.name]
                }
              }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    
      // Add all parameters as url parameters if there is no requestBody defined
      if (!operation.requestBody && !formData) {
        for (const key in bodyParams) {
          if (bodyParams[key] !== undefined) {
            urlParameters[key] = bodyParams[key]
            delete bodyParams[key]
          }
        }
      }
    
      const operationFn = (api as any)[operationId]
      if (!operationFn) {
        throw new Error(`Operation ${operationId} not found`)
      }
    
      try {
        // If we have form data, we need to set the correct headers
        const hasBody = Object.keys(bodyParams).length > 0
        const headers = formData
          ? formData.getHeaders()
          : { ...(hasBody ? { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } : { 'Content-Type': null }) }
        const requestConfig = {
          headers: {
            ...headers,
          },
        }
    
        // first argument is url parameters, second is body parameters
        const response = await operationFn(urlParameters, hasBody ? bodyParams : undefined, requestConfig)
    
        // Convert axios headers to Headers object
        const responseHeaders = new Headers()
        Object.entries(response.headers).forEach(([key, value]) => {
          if (value) responseHeaders.append(key, value.toString())
        })
    
        return {
          data: response.data,
          status: response.status,
          headers: responseHeaders,
        }
      } catch (error: any) {
        if (error.response) {
          console.error('Error in http client', error)
          const headers = new Headers()
          Object.entries(error.response.headers).forEach(([key, value]) => {
            if (value) headers.append(key, value.toString())
          })
    
          throw new HttpClientError(error.response.statusText || 'Request failed', error.response.status, error.response.data, headers)
        }
        throw error
      }
    }
  • Generates the input schema for each MCP tool (including 'API-retrieve-a-page') from the OpenAPI operation's parameters and requestBody.
    private convertOperationToMCPMethod(operation: OpenAPIV3.OperationObject, method: string, path: string): NewToolMethod | null {
      if (!operation.operationId) {
        console.warn(`Operation without operationId at ${method} ${path}`)
        return null
      }
    
      const methodName = operation.operationId
    
      const inputSchema: IJsonSchema & { type: 'object' } = {
        $defs: this.convertComponentsToJsonSchema(),
        type: 'object',
        properties: {},
        required: [],
      }
    
      // Handle parameters (path, query, header, cookie)
      if (operation.parameters) {
        for (const param of operation.parameters) {
          const paramObj = this.resolveParameter(param)
          if (paramObj && paramObj.schema) {
            const schema = this.convertOpenApiSchemaToJsonSchema(paramObj.schema, new Set(), false)
            // Merge parameter-level description if available
            if (paramObj.description) {
              schema.description = paramObj.description
            }
            inputSchema.properties![paramObj.name] = schema
            if (paramObj.required) {
              inputSchema.required!.push(paramObj.name)
            }
          }
        }
      }
    
      // Handle requestBody
      if (operation.requestBody) {
        const bodyObj = this.resolveRequestBody(operation.requestBody)
        if (bodyObj?.content) {
          // Handle multipart/form-data for file uploads
          // We convert the multipart/form-data schema to a JSON schema and we require
          // that the user passes in a string for each file that points to the local file
          if (bodyObj.content['multipart/form-data']?.schema) {
            const formSchema = this.convertOpenApiSchemaToJsonSchema(bodyObj.content['multipart/form-data'].schema, new Set(), false)
            if (formSchema.type === 'object' && formSchema.properties) {
              for (const [name, propSchema] of Object.entries(formSchema.properties)) {
                inputSchema.properties![name] = propSchema
              }
              if (formSchema.required) {
                inputSchema.required!.push(...formSchema.required!)
              }
            }
          }
          // Handle application/json
          else if (bodyObj.content['application/json']?.schema) {
            const bodySchema = this.convertOpenApiSchemaToJsonSchema(bodyObj.content['application/json'].schema, new Set(), false)
            // Merge body schema into the inputSchema's properties
            if (bodySchema.type === 'object' && bodySchema.properties) {
              for (const [name, propSchema] of Object.entries(bodySchema.properties)) {
                inputSchema.properties![name] = propSchema
              }
              if (bodySchema.required) {
                inputSchema.required!.push(...bodySchema.required!)
              }
            } else {
              // If the request body is not an object, just put it under "body"
              inputSchema.properties!['body'] = bodySchema
              inputSchema.required!.push('body')
            }
          }
        }
      }
    
      // Build description including error responses
      let description = operation.summary || operation.description || ''
      if (operation.responses) {
        const errorResponses = Object.entries(operation.responses)
          .filter(([code]) => code.startsWith('4') || code.startsWith('5'))
          .map(([code, response]) => {
            const responseObj = this.resolveResponse(response)
            let errorDesc = responseObj?.description || ''
            return `${code}: ${errorDesc}`
          })
    
        if (errorResponses.length > 0) {
          description += '\nError Responses:\n' + errorResponses.join('\n')
        }
      }
    
      // Extract return type (response schema)
      const returnSchema = this.extractResponseType(operation.responses)
    
      // Generate Zod schema from input schema
      try {
        // const zodSchemaStr = jsonSchemaToZod(inputSchema, { module: "cjs" })
        // console.log(zodSchemaStr)
        // // Execute the function with the zod instance
        // const zodSchema = eval(zodSchemaStr) as z.ZodType
    
        return {
          name: methodName,
          description,
          inputSchema,
          ...(returnSchema ? { returnSchema } : {}),
        }
      } catch (error) {
        console.warn(`Failed to generate Zod schema for ${methodName}:`, error)
        // Fallback to a basic object schema
        return {
          name: methodName,
          description,
          inputSchema,
          ...(returnSchema ? { returnSchema } : {}),
        }
      }
    }
  • Registers the listTools handler which dynamically lists all tools, including 'API-retrieve-a-page', generated from the OpenAPI spec.
    this.server.setRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema, async () => {
      const tools: Tool[] = []
    
      // Add methods as separate tools to match the MCP format
      Object.entries(this.tools).forEach(([toolName, def]) => {
        def.methods.forEach(method => {
          const toolNameWithMethod = `${toolName}-${method.name}`;
          const truncatedToolName = this.truncateToolName(toolNameWithMethod);
          tools.push({
            name: truncatedToolName,
            description: method.description,
            inputSchema: method.inputSchema as Tool['inputSchema'],
          })
        })
      })
    
      return { tools }
    })
  • In the MCPProxy constructor, converts the OpenAPI spec to MCP tools and lookup map, populating the 'API-retrieve-a-page' entry in openApiLookup.
    const converter = new OpenAPIToMCPConverter(openApiSpec)
    const { tools, openApiLookup } = converter.convertToMCPTools()
    this.tools = tools
    this.openApiLookup = openApiLookup
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Retrieve a page', implying a read-only operation, but fails to detail aspects like authentication requirements, rate limits, error handling, or what the retrieval includes (e.g., full content vs. metadata). This leaves significant gaps for an agent to understand how to use it effectively.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with 'Notion | Retrieve a page', which is front-loaded and wastes no words. However, it is arguably too brief, bordering on under-specified, as it could benefit from a bit more detail without losing efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a retrieval tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what is returned (e.g., page structure, properties, or content), how to handle the 'filter_properties' parameter effectively, or any behavioral traits. This leaves the agent with insufficient context for reliable use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema fully documents both parameters ('page_id' and 'filter_properties'). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as explaining parameter interactions or usage examples. Baseline is 3 since the schema handles the heavy lifting, but the description does not compensate or enhance understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Notion | Retrieve a page' states the action ('Retrieve') and resource ('a page'), which is clear but minimal. It lacks specificity about what 'retrieve' entails (e.g., fetching metadata, content, or properties) and does not distinguish it from sibling tools like 'API-retrieve-a-block' or 'API-retrieve-a-database', leaving ambiguity in scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not clarify if this is for basic page info versus using 'API-retrieve-a-page-property' for specific properties or 'API-post-search' for broader queries, nor does it mention prerequisites like needing a valid page ID.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/makenotion/notion-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server