Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Mailmodo

Mailmodo

Official
by mailmodo
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

userDetails

Retrieve comprehensive contact details including profile information and engagement metrics by providing an email address. Access user-specific data stored in Mailmodo for analysis and targeted campaigns.

Instructions

Tool to get all details of a contact

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "email": "<email>"
    },
    "name": "userDetails"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
emailYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

C2.7/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose side-effects, permissions, error handling, or output format. It only says 'get all details', omitting critical behavioral context like what happens if email is invalid or not found.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with the verb first. It is efficient but could be slightly more descriptive without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is lacking: no mention of return format, error states, or conditions. It fails to provide sufficient context for an agent to use it reliably.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description adds no extra meaning to the 'email' parameter beyond its existence. No format, validation rules, or examples are provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves all details of a contact, with the input being an email from the schema. It is distinct from sibling tools which are mainly mutation operations, but lacks specificity about what 'details' include.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no mention of prerequisites (e.g., email must exist), and no indication of context like read-only nature or when to prefer other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools