get--v3-ips-ip-domains

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions retrieving domains for a specific IP, but doesn't cover aspects like whether this is a read-only operation, potential rate limits, authentication needs, or what the return format looks like. This leaves significant gaps for a tool with 4 required parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's function without unnecessary words. It's appropriately sized and front-loaded, making it easy to grasp quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 4 required parameters, 0% schema coverage, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It should provide more details on parameters, behavioral traits, and expected outputs to adequately guide an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the schema provides no parameter details. The description only implies the 'ip' parameter's purpose ('specific IP is assigned') but doesn't explain 'limit', 'search', or 'skip', leaving three parameters undocumented. It adds minimal value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get all domains') and resource ('of an account where a specific IP is assigned'), making the purpose understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like 'get--v3-ips-ip' or 'get--v3-ip_pools-pool_id-domains', which appear related to IPs and domains, so it lacks sibling distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as the sibling tools that handle IPs or domains. It states what the tool does but offers no context, exclusions, or prerequisites for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.