get--v3-domain-tag-stats-aggregates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action without detailing whether it's read-only, has side effects, requires authentication, involves rate limits, or describes output format. This leaves critical behavioral aspects unspecified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words, making it front-loaded and easy to parse. However, this conciseness comes at the cost of under-specification.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (3 required parameters), lack of annotations, 0% schema coverage, and no output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It does not provide enough information for an agent to understand the tool's purpose, usage, behavior, or parameters adequately.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, with three required parameters (domain, tag, type) undocumented. The description mentions 'tag' but does not explain any parameters' meanings, formats, or constraints, failing to compensate for the schema's lack of documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get aggregate stat types by tag' restates the tool name with minimal elaboration, making it tautological. It specifies the action ('Get') and resource ('aggregate stat types by tag'), but lacks detail on what 'aggregate stat types' or 'tag' refer to, and does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'get--v3-domain-tag-stats' or 'get--v3-domain-stats-total'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, context, or exclusions, leaving the agent without direction on appropriate usage scenarios compared to sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.