Lists active DUMEdb schema dictionary specifications, including pre-registered and auto-discovered [AUTO] opcodes, to help agents discover valid registers and operations.
Returns active DUMEdb schema dictionary specifications, including both pre-registered
and auto-discovered [AUTO] opcodes.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Returns' strongly implies a read-only listing operation, and the description clarifies the content scope (active specs, including pre-registered and [AUTO] opcodes), but it does not explicitly cover permissions, side effects, or rate-limit behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant or filler content. It states the return scope efficiently.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With zero parameters and an output schema present, the description need not explain return values or parameter syntax. It sufficiently describes the schema-listing operation, though it omits usage context that could help an agent choose this tool over sibling listing/query tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline score is 4. The description does not need to explain parameter semantics, and the empty schema is consistent with a no-argument listing operation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Returns') and resource ('active DUMEdb schema dictionary specifications'), making the tool's purpose clear. It also narrows scope by noting pre-registered and auto-discovered [AUTO] opcodes, though it does not explicitly differentiate itself from siblings such as dume_list_module_context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description states what is returned but gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like dume_list_module_context or dume_query. There are also no stated prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.