Branch Thinking MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| branch-thinkingC | A tool for managing multiple branches of thought with insights and cross-references. Each thought can:
The system tracks:
Commands:
|
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool 'branch-thinking' has a clear and distinct purpose for managing thought branches, making disambiguation perfect.
Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'branch-thinking' follows a clear noun-based pattern, and there are no other tools to cause inconsistency.
A single tool is too few for the apparent scope of managing multiple branches of thought with features like listing, focusing, and showing history. This server likely needs additional tools (e.g., for creating branches, adding thoughts, or deleting branches) to be well-scoped, making the count inappropriate.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for the domain of thought management. While the tool handles listing, focusing, and history, there are significant gaps such as creating or deleting branches, adding or modifying thoughts, and managing insights or cross-references directly, which will cause agent failures in comprehensive workflows.