update_card_name
Renames a Trello card by specifying its ID and the new name.
Instructions
Update a card name
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cardId | Yes | ID of the card to be updated | |
| name | Yes | New name of the card |
Renames a Trello card by specifying its ID and the new name.
Update a card name
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cardId | Yes | ID of the card to be updated | |
| name | Yes | New name of the card |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Update', implying mutation, but fails to mention permissions, side effects, or whether the operation is reversible.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (4 words) but lacks necessary detail. It earns its place but is underinformative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema exists, so description should explain return values or error conditions, but it does not. The tool is simple but incomplete in context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters have descriptions. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, meeting baseline but not exceeding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool updates a card name, but does not differentiate it from sibling tools like update_list_name or move_card. It is specific to the resource and action.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as archive_card or add_comment. The description lacks context for selective use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lzvxck/trello-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server