archive_card
Organize your Trello boards by archiving cards that are no longer needed, keeping your workflow focused.
Instructions
Archive a card
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cardId | Yes | ID of the card to archive |
Organize your Trello boards by archiving cards that are no longer needed, keeping your workflow focused.
Archive a card
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cardId | Yes | ID of the card to archive |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It does not disclose side effects (e.g., card visibility changes, reversibility) or any behavior beyond the bare action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, concise sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately sized for the simple operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks context on behavioral impacts (e.g., permanence, permissions) that would help an agent understand full implications.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning to the parameter beyond what the schema already states ('ID of the card to archive').
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Archive a card' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like archive_list (different resource) and other card operations (create_card, move_card).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., deleting or hiding a card). No prerequisites or conditions for archiving are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lzvxck/trello-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server