Skip to main content
Glama
lutfizp

keel

by lutfizp
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to keel

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • apex

      nadirzhon
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables authorized bug bounty automation via a scope-enforced MCP bridge, supporting web, secrets, mobile, and LLM red-team scanning, with reporting and advisory.
      MIT

    • BountyProof MCP

      skyxtools
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for authorized bug bounty work that enforces an evidence-driven workflow with session management, preflight checks, surface discovery, and verified scanning.
      12
      MIT
    • HuntX by IAZENT

      HuntXofficial

      IAZENT
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing direct tool-access to security-testing primitives for bug bounty hunting, including recon, request replay, IDOR/BOLA fuzzing, vulnerability detection, secrets scanning, and persistent hunt memory with confidence-scored findings.
      38
      -

    • BugBounty MCP Server

      rifqy354
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables automated bug bounty hunting and security research with tools for reconnaissance, web vulnerability scanning, API testing, binary analysis, and mobile app analysis through an MCP interface.
      MIT

    • Cockpit Lite MCP Server

      kom9
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables authorized penetration testing through MCP, providing parallel reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, attack path analysis, and self-contained HTML reporting with compliance tagging.
      MIT

    • pentest-ai

      0xSteph
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Autonomous pentests from one command: real security tools, working PoCs, and audit-ready reports, all driven via MCP.
      451 PyPI
      1,675
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: engagements, waves, proofs, and cards are cleanly separated. The two execute tools are disambiguated by proof vs wave, and the two draft tools by waves vs proof, so an agent should not confuse them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern like execute_proof, begin_engagement, draft_waves, and query_cards. engagement_health and second_look break the pattern by using noun phrases, but the overall convention remains readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is a well-scoped size for this domain, covering engagement setup, wave and proof execution, and card interaction without unnecessary redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    The core loop is represented, but there is no explicit admission step for drafted waves before execute_wave, and engagements lack update/close lifecycle operations. These are notable workflow gaps that could stall end-to-end operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources