No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: engagements, waves, proofs, and cards are cleanly separated. The two execute tools are disambiguated by proof vs wave, and the two draft tools by waves vs proof, so an agent should not confuse them.
Most tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern like execute_proof, begin_engagement, draft_waves, and query_cards. engagement_health and second_look break the pattern by using noun phrases, but the overall convention remains readable and predictable.
Nine tools is a well-scoped size for this domain, covering engagement setup, wave and proof execution, and card interaction without unnecessary redundancy or bloat.
The core loop is represented, but there is no explicit admission step for drafted waves before execute_wave, and engagements lack update/close lifecycle operations. These are notable workflow gaps that could stall end-to-end operations.