update_in_app_product

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description holds the burden. It discloses 'Disabled in read-only mode', indicating it's a write operation, but does not mention other behaviors like idempotency, side effects, or auth requirements. Minimal but adds one relevant trait.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise with two sentences, no fluff, and front-loaded main purpose. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description is minimal for a tool with a nested product object and auto-convert flag. It doesn't clarify what 'replace' entails, prerequisites, or specific behaviors beyond the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so all parameters are already documented. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, resulting in baseline score of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the verb 'Update (replace)' and the resource 'existing in-app product', distinguishing it from create, patch, and delete siblings. 'Replace' clarifies the operation is a full overwrite.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this vs. alternative tools like patch_in_app_product. The description implies update use but does not mention exclusions or comparisons with siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.