batch_update_subscription_offer_states

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only mentions that it is disabled in read-only mode, which is a start, but it does not disclose potential side effects, whether it is destructive, or if it requires special permissions. The batch nature implies changes but not their reversibility or impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the main action. The read-only restriction is an essential note. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a batch mutation with a complex request structure (nested objects), but the schema covers parameters well and there is an output schema. However, the description does not explain the outcome or any constraints beyond read-only mode, so it is minimally complete but not rich.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes each parameter with meaningful descriptions (e.g., 'Parent subscription product ID', 'List of UpdateSubscriptionOfferStateRequest bodies'). The description adds little beyond schema, but since schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it activates or deactivates multiple subscription offers at once, which is distinct from single-offer actions like activate_subscription_offer and deactivate_subscription_offer. It does not mention the specific resource (subscription offers) in the first sentence, but it is clear enough from the tool name and context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates it is for batch operations, which distinguishes it from individual activate/deactivate tools. It lacks explicit guidance on when not to use it (e.g., for single operations), but the purpose implies batch usage clearly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.