Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to SatisfactoryMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools to query Factorio recipes, technologies, and save progress, including search, production chain analysis, and plan validation against a specific save's research and enabled recipes.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for managing recipes, meal plans, shopping lists, and more through a self-hosted Mealie instance.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An external MCP server for diagnosing Minecraft servers via backup analysis, local runtime, or Docker runtime, offering tools for plugin inspection, log analysis, configuration linting, and performance diagnostics.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 49 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly differentiated by detailed descriptions, but several related clusters blur at the edges, e.g. factory_map/propose_factories/factory_sites and plan_factory/plan_from_factory/plans. An expert agent can usually select correctly after reading, but the cognitive load is high enough to risk occasional misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names consistently use snake_case and are readable. The convention is not strictly verb_noun throughout, since noun-only tools like inventory, crates, plans, and bom mix with verb-led names, but the deviations are minor.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 49 tools, the surface is far above the 3-15 well-scoped range and squarely in the rubric's 25+ 'too many' band. Even for a deep Satisfactory planning domain, this many tools create significant selection overhead and should be consolidated into narrower groups.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad across planning, factories, recipes, resources, inventory, research, power, and map views, with few obvious dead ends for core workflows. Minor gaps remain around vehicle/train logistics and direct build/dismantle actions, but the main domain lifecycle is well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive