SatisfactoryMCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to SatisfactoryMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Minecraft that manages map points, provides recipes and guides, and enables inspection/download of files and worlds via the exaroton REST API.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides MCP tools to query Factorio recipes, technologies, and save progress, including search, production chain analysis, and plan validation against a specific save's research and enabled recipes.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for managing recipes, meal plans, shopping lists, and more through a self-hosted Mealie instance.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA MCP server for KitchenOwl inventory estimates and recipe recommendations.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn external MCP server for diagnosing Minecraft servers via backup analysis, local runtime, or Docker runtime, offering tools for plugin inspection, log analysis, configuration linting, and performance diagnostics.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server providing tools for YouTube search, AI trip planning, notes management, web search, and product price comparison, backed by a FastAPI backend.-
TDQS
Scored across 49 tools
Most tools are clearly differentiated by detailed descriptions, but several related clusters blur at the edges, e.g. factory_map/propose_factories/factory_sites and plan_factory/plan_from_factory/plans. An expert agent can usually select correctly after reading, but the cognitive load is high enough to risk occasional misselection.
All tool names consistently use snake_case and are readable. The convention is not strictly verb_noun throughout, since noun-only tools like inventory, crates, plans, and bom mix with verb-led names, but the deviations are minor.
At 49 tools, the surface is far above the 3-15 well-scoped range and squarely in the rubric's 25+ 'too many' band. Even for a deep Satisfactory planning domain, this many tools create significant selection overhead and should be consolidated into narrower groups.
Coverage is broad across planning, factories, recipes, resources, inventory, research, power, and map views, with few obvious dead ends for core workflows. Minor gaps remain around vehicle/train logistics and direct build/dismantle actions, but the main domain lifecycle is well supported.