SatisfactoryMCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to SatisfactoryMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Minecraft that manages map points, provides recipes and guides, and enables inspection/download of files and worlds via the exaroton REST API.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides MCP tools to query Factorio recipes, technologies, and save progress, including search, production chain analysis, and plan validation against a specific save's research and enabled recipes.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for managing recipes, meal plans, shopping lists, and more through a self-hosted Mealie instance.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA MCP server for KitchenOwl inventory estimates and recipe recommendations.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn external MCP server for diagnosing Minecraft servers via backup analysis, local runtime, or Docker runtime, offering tools for plugin inspection, log analysis, configuration linting, and performance diagnostics.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server providing tools for YouTube search, AI trip planning, notes management, web search, and product price comparison, backed by a FastAPI backend.-
TDQS
Scored across 54 tools
Descriptions are unusually detailed and most tools have a specific niche, but overlapping factory_* and recipe/plan vocabularies create real selection risk. An agent could confuse factory_map, propose_factories, and factory_sites, or search_recipes, alternates_for_item, and compare_recipe_options without careful reading.
All names use snake_case, but the convention is mixed: some are verb_noun (search_items, plan_factory), while many are bare nouns (stock, bom, factory_map, world_summary). Pluralization and phrasing are uneven, though the set remains readable.
With 54 tools, the server is far beyond the 3-15 sweet spot and well past the 25+ 'too many' threshold. The domain is broad, but the surface feels like several toolsets merged, making discovery and context management difficult.
Coverage is strong for recipes, factories, plans, resources, power, research, collectibles, and map analysis, with lifecycle operations for plans and factory labels. Missing or thin areas include vehicle/train/drone logistics and blueprint editing, but core planning workflows are well supported.