PerspectiveGraph
Related Servers
Alternatives to PerspectiveGraph
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only scanning and graph mapping of a cloud estate, revealing public exposure, connectivity, firewall and NSG rules, identity permissions, and RBAC with cited evidence.16MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local-first AWS security tool that uses graph theory to discover attack paths (e.g., Internet → Role → DB) and prioritize remediations. It allows agents to perform read-only security audits and generate Terraform fixes without data exfiltration.1562 PyPI4Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI to scan AWS accounts, analyze attack paths, and verify security fixes on a read-only graph of cloud resources.4-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for auditing infrastructure-as-code attack paths, finding multi-hop chains from public internet to sensitive resources.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-aware agents to read and explore Oracle Cloud Infrastructure — listing, fetching, and searching across 39 resource types spanning Identity, Compute, Block Volume, Networking, Object Storage, and OKE. Runs locally over stdio using credentials from ~/.oci/config, with fail-closed safety gates and audit logging governing future write operations.4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only exploration of SAP Datasphere tenants, letting users list spaces and modeling objects, read objects' raw CSN definitions, and trace upstream dependency graphs with evidence. It enforces read-only DEV/QAS/PRD access through the official SAP Datasphere CLI and OAuth, with no mutation, SQL, or arbitrary command capabilities.4Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: explain_attack_path drills into one route, list_attack_paths ranks all routes, routes_to_target enumerates routes to a specific asset, and simulate_fix tests changes. The only potential confusion is between list_attack_paths and routes_to_target, but their descriptions clarify one is a global ranked list while the other is target-specific choke-point analysis.
The dominant pattern is verb_noun (explain_attack_path, get_posture, list_attack_paths, search_assets, simulate_fix). One outlier, routes_to_target, is a noun phrase rather than verb_noun, and there is minor singular/plural variation (attack_path vs attack_paths, fix vs fixes), but overall the naming is predictable and readable.
Eight tools is well-scoped for a security analysis server. Each tool earns its place: orientation, enumeration, deep-dive, trust calibration, remediation planning, and counterfactual simulation. No tool feels redundant or missing to make the set bloated or thin.
The tool surface covers the core lifecycle: orient (get_posture, search_assets), enumerate (list_attack_paths, routes_to_target), explain (explain_attack_path), validate score trust (get_score_trust), and remediate (list_fixes, simulate_fix). A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated asset-detail or relationship-detail tool, but search_assets and explain_attack_path compensate sufficiently for common workflows.