Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to LookaCrawler

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A fault-tolerant, stealth-enabled Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for web searching and content fetching. Built for AI Agents (Cursor, Claude Code, OpenCode), it uses a stealth browser engine to fetch pages, dynamically handles SPAs/React, and converts bloat into token-optimized Markdown.
      2
      13 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Open-source web scraper and extraction MCP server with JavaScript rendering, markdown output, PDF/DOCX parsing, structured errors, and validated extraction contract diagnostics for agents.
      2
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Web content extraction for AI agents. 10 tools: scrape, crawl, map, batch, extract, summarize, diff, brand, search, research. Uses TLS fingerprinting to bypass anti-bot without a headless browser. Outputs LLM-optimized markdown with 67% fewer tokens than raw HTML.
      10
      2,371
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that lets AI agents read any webpage as clean Markdown, crawl whole sites within configured limits, search without API keys, and solve supported captchas locally — all without cloud services or third-party keys.
      30
      19
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables web scraping, crawling, and content extraction capabilities through integration with Firecrawl.
      8
      133,864 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct roles, but search_places and discover_local_leads both appear to perform Google Maps business discovery with nearly identical output fields, making selection ambiguous. deep_enrich_lead also overlaps with extract_contacts and crawl_website, though its lead-focused summary provides some differentiation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case and generally follow a verb-first pattern, which is readable and predictable. Minor deviations like batch_extract_web_content and deep_enrich_lead are understandable but slightly less consistent with the core verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a web crawling, extraction, and lead-generation server. Each tool covers a meaningful capability without excessive fragmentation.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers discovery, single and batch content extraction, structured data, recursive crawling, contact extraction, local search, lead discovery, and enrichment. A few adjacent capabilities such as generic web search or document/PDF extraction are missing, but core crawler and lead workflows are well represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive