create_interactive_session

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are unhelpful (all false) and the description does not disclose side effects, resource allocation, or required permissions. It merely states 'Create', which is already obvious from the name, and adds no behavioral context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. It is appropriately concise, though it sacrifices completeness for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with four parameters, no schema descriptions, and no usage guidance, the description is insufficient. It does not explain output behavior or return value, despite having an output schema. The description lacks necessary context for correct use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not explain any of the four parameters (cwd, env, command, session_id). Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description fails to compensate, leaving the agent with no insight into parameter meaning or usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'new interactive OpenROAD session', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like terminate_interactive_session and list_interactive_sessions. It is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool, prerequisites, or when not to use it. It does not mention any alternatives or context for invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.