tp_get_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits, but it only says 'Get athlete profile'. It does not mention that the operation is read-only, whether authentication is required, what data the profile includes, or any potential side effects. The usage note is not a behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two short sentences that convey the purpose and usage. Every word earns its place, and the key information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description should explain what 'profile' contains or what the return value looks like. It does not. The usage note is helpful but does not compensate for the lack of details about the profile content or operation behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides 100% coverage for the 'athlete' parameter, including that it is for coach accounts and defaults to the user's own profile. The description adds no further parameter semantics, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get athlete profile' with a specific verb and resource. It further distinguishes itself from sibling tools by noting it is 'Rarely needed' and that other tools work without it, providing helpful differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'Rarely needed - other tools work without it' offers explicit context on when to use this tool, implying that alternatives should be preferred unless the profile is specifically required. It lacks named alternatives but gives a clear 'when not to use' indication.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.