mochi_delete_card
Delete a Mochi flashcard by providing its unique card ID to remove it from your deck.
Instructions
Delete a Mochi flashcard by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| card_id | Yes | The ID of the card to delete |
Delete a Mochi flashcard by providing its unique card ID to remove it from your deck.
Delete a Mochi flashcard by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| card_id | Yes | The ID of the card to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description must carry the burden. It only states the action without disclosing consequences (e.g., permanent deletion, required permissions, error handling).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no unnecessary words, front-loaded with action and resource. Highly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter delete tool without output schema, the description is adequate. Could mention irreversibility, but still sufficient for basic usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description for card_id. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb (Delete), resource (Mochi flashcard), and method (by ID). It distinguishes from siblings like mochi_create_card or mochi_update_card.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool or alternatives. Implies use when a card ID is known, but does not provide context on when to prefer over other delete methods or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/louis030195/mochi-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server