brc_get_nominal_account_ledger_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description merely states 'Gets', implying a read operation, but does not disclose side effects, authentication requirements, error scenarios, or return format. With full burden on description, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise single sentence with clear front-loading. No redundant words. Every word contributes to the purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists. The description fails to indicate what the tool returns (e.g., account details, ledger entries). Given the tool's name includes 'ledger', this is a notable gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters (id, companyName). The description adds no additional meaning beyond 'by id'. Baseline score applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb (gets), resource (BRC nominal account), and identifier (by id). It distinguishes from the sibling 'brc_get_nom_ac_ledger_by_ids' which retrieves multiple. However, it does not clarify what a BRC nominal account is or what the ledger portion means.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For instance, it could mention that 'brc_get_nom_ac_ledger_by_ids' is for multiple accounts. No context about prerequisites or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.