get_qr_code
Retrieve the current WhatsApp QR code image to authenticate and establish a WhatsApp session.
Instructions
Get the latest WhatsApp QR code as an image for authentication
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve the current WhatsApp QR code image to authenticate and establish a WhatsApp session.
Get the latest WhatsApp QR code as an image for authentication
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds value beyond the annotations by specifying that the QR code is 'latest' and 'as an image'. Annotations already indicate read-only and idempotent behavior, and the description is consistent and non-contradictory.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence of 11 words, immediately stating the verb and resource. Every word adds value, with no redundancy or extraneous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has no parameters and no output schema, the description fully covers the tool's purpose (get QR code), context (authentication), and output format (image). No additional information is needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters in the input schema, and the description does not need to explain them further. The baseline for zero parameters is 4, and this description meets that standard.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the specific verb 'Get', the resource 'latest WhatsApp QR code', and the purpose 'for authentication'. This uniquely identifies the tool among siblings, as no other tool retrieves a QR code.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context that this tool is used for authentication via QR code, which implies when to use it. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use it or suggest alternatives, though such exclusions are less critical for a simple read-only tool with no parameters.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/loglux/whatsapp-mcp-stream'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server