Skip to main content
Glama
log-10x

Log10x MCP Server

Official

Sign out

log10x_signout
Idempotent

Sign out of Log10x by deleting stored credentials and reverting to demo mode. Does not revoke API keys; unset LOG10X_API_KEY if set.

Instructions

Wipe the persistent credentials file at ~/.log10x/credentials and reload envs so subsequent calls fall back to demo mode (or whichever lower-priority configuration source picks up). Call this for: "sign me out of Log10x", "log out", "remove my Log10x credentials", "stop using my Log10x account", "go back to demo mode". Idempotent: running it without saved credentials is a no-op. Does NOT revoke the API key on the BE; the user must do that from console.log10x.com → Profile → API Settings if they want to invalidate the key everywhere (mirrors gh auth logout and aws sso logout). If the user has LOG10X_API_KEY set in their MCP host config, that env var will still be active after sign-out: the tool result will flag this so the LLM can tell the user to also unset it and restart.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
toolYes
viewNosummary
imagesNo
actionsNo
summaryYes
warningsNo
truncatedNo
next_cursorNo
render_hintNo
generated_atYes
schema_epochYes
schema_versionYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.30.7

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare idempotentHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, and the description reinforces this with an explicit no-op guarantee plus context beyond the schema: the BE-side API key is NOT revoked, the user must do that in the console, and a lingering LOG10X_API_KEY env var will still be active and is flagged in the result. This is far richer than the structured fields alone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Opens with the concrete action, then a bolded trigger list, then edge-case behavior in short declarative sentences. Each sentence carries distinct information (idempotency, non-revocation, env-var caveat) with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-format explanation is unnecessary, and the description still notes that the result flags a lingering env var. For a zero-parameter, idempotent auth tool, nothing an agent needs to call it correctly or warn the user is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes no parameters, which is the baseline-4 case; there is nothing for the description to disambiguate. The trigger-phrase list is about intent, not parameters, so no additional credit is warranted here.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: wipes the credentials file at `~/.log10x/credentials` and reloads envs to fall back to demo mode. An agent can distinguish this from siblings like log10x_login_status or log10x_signin_start without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides an explicit 'Call this for' list of user phrasings ('sign me out', 'log out', 'remove my credentials', 'go back to demo mode'), which maps intent directly to the tool. It also states the boundary against alternatives by naming the higher-priority env-var source that survives sign-out.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.