Log10x MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Log10x MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query multi-cloud cost and usage data through a uniform read-only toolset, including cost summaries, trends, budgets, forecasts, and optimization recommendations.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides seamless access to Kibana and Periscope logs through a unified API with KQL and SQL querying, AI-powered log analysis, and support for searching across 1.3+ billion logs in 9 indexes.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and managing AI logs through tools like listing logs, retrieving jobs, and performing AI-powered chat queries. Also provides access to gateway security reports and guardrail testing.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLets AI agents query, manage, and operate their LLM observability data directly from the conversation. Provides 87 tools for cost analysis, alerting, anomaly detection, and runtime control gates.87209 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query OriginChain's telemetry agent for log patterns, semantic incident analysis, distributed traces, service graphs, and read-only SQL queries over telemetry data.1075 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze cloud billing data in FOCUS format through natural language queries. Provides 36+ predefined cost analysis queries, custom SQL execution, and schema documentation for multi-cloud cost optimization and FinOps practices.11Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 55 tools
Tool names and descriptions establish distinct boundaries, but several clusters genuinely overlap: log10x_savings vs log10x_estimate_savings vs log10x_commitment_report, the retriever family (query/series/probe/query_status), the POC family (from_local/from_siem_submit/from_siem_status), and multiple 'what changed' tools (top_patterns/whats_changing/whats_new/pattern_diff). The verbose routing hints embedded in descriptions (e.g. 'call X not Y') actually confirm that selection is error-prone and requires careful reading rather than being self-evident.
Every tool uses the uniform log10x_ prefix plus a consistent snake_case verb_noun or verb_noun_qualifier pattern (log10x_retriever_query, log10x_pattern_trend, log10x_compile_status). No camelCase or mixed conventions anywhere. Naming is fully predictable.
At 55 tools this is well past the heavy threshold and forces the agent to carry a very large surface for one server, with many near-siblings that only differ by nuance. While the broad platform scope (install, signin, cost, retrieval, compile, cross-pillar, POC) means each tool maps to some real capability, the count is still excessive and several tools could be merged.
Coverage is genuinely broad and closed-loop: sign-in/out lifecycle, env validation and diffing, install/discovery advisors, cost attribution and mitigation, retrieval/rehydration, compile, and cross-pillar correlation all have entry points with status/poll companions. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no true delete/teardown for some artifacts, some backends explicitly deferred), but the surface covers the stated domain well.