Skip to main content
Glama
lm203688

SwarmLabs MCP Server

by lm203688
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to SwarmLabs MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • yellow-pages

      ethank64
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes two MCP tools (discover and execute) that enable agents to query an OpenAPI schema via natural language and execute matched API operations.
      2
      -

    • math-anchor

      tetracoralla
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a safe scientific runtime for agents with typed math operations including calculus, algebra, statistics, unit conversion, and more via MCP tools.
      4
      Apache 2.0

    • hydroemu-mcp-server

      nesar-ai-assistant
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes HACC cosmological hydrodynamic simulation emulators (GSMF, HMF, cluster profiles, P(k) suppression) as MCP tools, allowing LLM agents to predict observables and generate comparison plots.
      1
      MIT

    • copamind-mcp

      Phemassa
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the CopaMind platform via MCP, exposing read-only and write tools for querying match predictions, Monte Carlo simulations, team rankings, and RAG-based explanations, all while maintaining full traceability and reproducibility.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct roles: discovery (list_scenarios, get_held_out_template), evidence chains (wet_lab_anchors), and scoring (verify_prediction). However, gate_decision, ledger_provenance, and verify_prediction all return a 'gate' value and gate_decision can also emit the whole ledger summary, creating mild overlap that descriptions mostly but not entirely resolve.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case, but the set mixes verb_noun (list_scenarios, get_held_out_template, verify_prediction) with noun_phrases (gate_decision, ledger_provenance, wet_lab_anchors). It remains readable but there is no single predictable verb/action convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a held-out validation/gating server, with each tool covering a distinct stage (discovery, evidence chains, template, scoring, gate state, provenance). No tool feels redundant or padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full pipeline: find scenarios, fetch a template, submit predictions, get verdict/gate, and check provenance and a second evidence chain. Coverage is strong, though there is no explicit tool for retrieving historical prediction results or comparing multiple submissions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources