Skip to main content
Glama
lluvr

frame-check-mcp

by lluvr
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to frame-check-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • clearon-source-audit

      kwgoodwin
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables revision-bound source audits with exact article fingerprinting, claim-to-source mapping, quotation verification, and immutable JSON evidence reports for prepublication review.
      9
      MIT

    • BigContext MCP

      Rixmerz
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables working with large documents of any size by intelligently segmenting them and using TF-IDF search to retrieve only relevant fragments, preventing context window saturation. Provides 31 domain-agnostic tools for document ingestion, semantic analysis, epistemological validation, and extraction verification across formats like PDF, EPUB, and HTML.
      31
      MIT

    • Visual Document Forensics MCP

      PranayK07
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic visual and structural analysis of PDF and DOCX documents, extracting measurable evidence such as blur, OCR confidence, and image anomalies for auditable forensic workflows.
      1
      -

    • genpark-study-methodology-bias

      Alpha-Park
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables auditing scientific papers for methodological biases such as selection bias and p-hacking, and assessing citation credibility and research consensus.
      8
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one analyzes a single document, the other compares two documents. There is no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the consistent 'frame_<verb>' pattern (frame_check, frame_compare). The naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels minimal. While the tools are well-scoped, a server for structural analysis might benefit from additional tools for tasks like batch comparison or result export.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the two core operations (single analysis and pairwise comparison). Minor gaps exist, such as lacking a tool for multi-document analysis or aggregation, but the main use cases are addressed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources