Anti-Bullshit MCP Server
The Anti-Bullshit MCP Server provides tools for analyzing information by:
Analyze Claims: Evaluate claims using multiple epistemological frameworks (empirical, responsible, harmonic, pluralistic) to assess evidence, ethical implications, coherence, and practical outcomes.
Validate Sources: Cross-reference and validate the credibility, authority, and methodological soundness of cited sources.
Detect Manipulation: Identify tactics such as emotional manipulation, false authority, and urgency creation that undermine information integrity.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Anti-Bullshit MCP Server analyze this claim: 'This supplement boosts immunity by 300% according to a recent study'"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Anti-Bullshit MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol server for analyzing claims, validating sources, and detecting manipulation using multiple epistemological frameworks.
Features
The server provides three main tools for detecting and analyzing bullshit:
1. analyze_claim
Analyzes claims using multiple epistemological frameworks:
Empirical Framework
Focuses on verifiable evidence
Evaluates reproducible results
Cross-references academic and scientific sources
Assesses methodological rigor
Responsible Framework
Evaluates ethical implications
Assesses community impact
Considers traditional knowledge
Validates source credibility
Harmonic Framework
Assesses coherence with established knowledge
Integrates multiple perspectives
Considers contextual appropriateness
Evaluates systemic implications
Pluralistic Framework
Combines all other frameworks
Considers multiple ways of knowing
Evaluates contextual appropriateness
Assesses practical outcomes
Checks alignment with community values
2. validate_sources
Extracts and analyzes cited sources
Validates credibility and authority
Cross-references across multiple platforms
Evaluates methodological soundness
Checks for conflicts of interest
3. check_manipulation
Detects manipulation tactics including:
Emotional manipulation
Social pressure
False authority
Artificial scarcity
Urgency creation
Related MCP server: Kluster.ai Verify MCP
Installation
Prerequisites
Node.js >= 18.0.0
npm or yarn
Setup
Install dependencies:
npm installBuild the server:
npm run buildAdd to Claude Desktop (MacOS):
{
"mcpServers": {
"anti-bullshit": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/anti-bullshit-mcp-server/build/index.js"]
}
}
}Path: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
Or for VSCode extension:
Path: ~/Library/Application Support/Code/User/globalStorage/saoudrizwan.claude-dev/settings/cline_mcp_settings.json
Usage Examples
// Analyze a claim
const result = await analyze_claim({
text: "Studies show that 87% of experts agree with this controversial claim",
framework: "empirical"
});
// Validate sources
const validation = await validate_sources({
text: "According to Dr. Smith's groundbreaking research...",
framework: "responsible"
});
// Check for manipulation
const check = await check_manipulation({
text: "Act now! This exclusive offer expires in the next 10 minutes!"
});Development
For development with auto-rebuild:
npm run watchDebug with MCP Inspector:
npm run inspectorTesting Timeline
The server uses 2025-01-01 as the reference date for temporal analysis of claims (particularly relevant for Goodman's "grue" paradox and similar philosophical puzzles).
License
MIT
Author
Teglon Labs (teglon@vibes.lol)
Contributing
Fork the repository
Create your feature branch (
git checkout -b feature/amazing-feature)Commit your changes (
git commit -am 'Add some amazing feature')Push to the branch (
git push origin feature/amazing-feature)Open a Pull Request
Available Tools
3 toolsanalyze_claimC
Analyze a claim using multiple epistemological frameworks and suggest validation steps
Inputs: text (required), framework.
check_manipulationC
Check for manipulation tactics across different cultural contexts
Inputs: text (required).
validate_sourcesC
Validate sources and evidence using configured framework
Inputs: text (required), framework.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: analyze_claim focuses on epistemological frameworks and validation steps, check_manipulation targets manipulation tactics across cultures, and validate_sources deals with source and evidence validation. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (analyze_claim, check_manipulation, validate_sources) with clear, descriptive verbs and nouns. The naming is uniform and predictable throughout the set.
With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for its broad domain of anti-bullshit analysis, which could include more operations like fact-checking, bias detection, or reporting. While each tool is distinct, the count is borderline low for comprehensive coverage.
The tools cover analysis, manipulation checking, and source validation, but there are notable gaps such as lack of fact-checking, bias assessment, or result summarization tools. Agents might encounter dead ends when needing broader anti-bullshit workflows.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
49 deterministic tools for text integrity, agent control, and contextual quality evidence.
Runtime gate for AI agent claims. Catches sycophantic drift, circular self-validation, causal errors
Verify claims with verdict, confidence & cited sources; batch verify, source checks, daily brief.
Fact-checks generated content against your sources of truth showing what to trust, change, & verify.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides cognitive tools for critical thinking and multi-perspective analysis of current affairs through structured prompts, including claim deconstruction, perspective comparison, and analysis through 9 analytical lenses (historical, economic, geopolitical, etc.).1-

Kluster.ai Verify MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables fact-checking of AI responses against reliable sources and validation of responses against document content to ensure accuracy and reliability.-- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables structural framing analysis of documents, identifying perspectives, omissions, and reader positioning, with numerical claim verification against authoritative sources.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to verify claims with evidence-based truth scores and confidence levels by running a deterministic pipeline of evidence lanes and adversarial checks.26MIT