Skip to main content
Glama
lkm1developer

Apollo.io MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Apollo.io MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants to interact with Apollo.io data, allowing for people and organization enrichment, search capabilities, and job posting retrieval through natural language commands.
      7
      102 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for the Apollo.io API, giving AI coding assistants direct access to Apollo.io's sales intelligence platform for prospecting, enrichment, CRM operations, and outreach.
      50
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Apollo.io API that lets LLMs search and enrich people and company data.
      66 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Apollo.io B2B database enabling people and company search, enrichment, and insights through conversational interfaces.
      9
      2,939 npm
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Apollo.io MCP server for prospecting, lead enrichment, sales intelligence, and outreach workflows. Integrates Apollo.io go-to-market data into MCP-compatible AI applications.
      28
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Apollo.io B2B sales intelligence API. Enables searching and enriching people and organizations via natural language.
      7
      17 npm
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some potential overlap between organization_search and organization_enrichment, as both involve company data retrieval. However, their descriptions clarify that search is for finding organizations while enrichment is for augmenting data on a known company, which helps mitigate confusion. The other tools target clearly different resources like employees, emails, job postings, and people.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a consistent snake_case pattern throughout, which is good. However, there is a minor inconsistency: most tools use a verb_noun format (e.g., organization_search, people_enrichment), but employees_of_company uses a noun_of_noun structure, deviating slightly from the pattern. This does not severely impact readability but is a noticeable deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the count is well-scoped for a sales intelligence or recruitment domain, covering key operations like searching and enriching data for both organizations and people. Each tool appears to earn its place without feeling excessive or sparse, aligning well with the server's apparent purpose of data enrichment and lookup.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides solid coverage for core workflows in the domain, including search and enrichment for both organizations and people, plus specific functions like finding employees and emails. A minor gap is the lack of update or delete operations, but this is reasonable for a read-heavy enrichment server. The surface supports common agent tasks without obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues