Skip to main content
Glama
liueic

PubChem Chemical Safety MCP Server

by liueic

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
CACHE_DIRNoCache directory path.cache
http_proxyNoHTTP proxy setting
https_proxyNoHTTPS proxy setting
PUBCHEM_RATE_LIMITNoAPI request limit (requests per second)5

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
get_compound_infoC

获取化合物基础信息

Args: name: 化合物名称

Returns: 包含CID、分子式、分子量等基础信息的字典

get_safety_infoB

获取GHS安全分类信息

Args: cid: PubChem化合物ID

Returns: 包含信号词、GHS象形图、危害声明等安全信息的字典

get_toxicity_dataC

获取毒性实验数据

Args: cid: PubChem化合物ID

Returns: 包含急性毒性、生态毒性、致癌性等毒性数据的字典

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_compound_info retrieves basic chemical properties, get_safety_info focuses on GHS hazard classifications, and get_toxicity_data provides experimental toxicity data. There is no overlap in functionality, and the descriptions clearly differentiate their domains (basic info vs. safety vs. toxicity).

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix and snake_case naming (get_compound_info, get_safety_info, get_toxicity_data). This predictable structure makes it easy for agents to understand and navigate the toolset without confusion.

Tool Count3/5

With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a chemical safety domain that might benefit from additional operations like searching compounds, batch queries, or regulatory data. While the tools cover core areas, the low count limits comprehensive coverage and could require agents to work around missing functionality.

Completeness3/5

The tools cover key aspects (basic info, safety, toxicity) but leave notable gaps. There is no search or lookup tool to find compounds by criteria, no batch operations for efficiency, and no update/delete capabilities (though less critical here). Agents may struggle to initiate workflows without a way to discover compounds beyond direct name input.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues